Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators.

BACKGROUND The presence of left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram may conceal the changes of acute myocardial infarction, which can delay both its recognition and treatment. We tested electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of acute infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. METHODS The base-line electrocardiograms of patients enrolled in the GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) trial who had left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction confirmed by enzyme studies were blindly compared with the electrocardiograms of control patients who had chronic coronary artery disease and left bundle-branch block. The electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of infarction were then tested in an independent sample of patients presenting with acute chest pain and left bundle-branch block. RESULTS Of 26,003 North American patients, 131 (0.5 percent) with acute myocardial infarction had left bundle-branch block. The three electrocardiographic criteria with independent value in the diagnosis of acute infarction in these patients were an ST-segment elevation of 1 mm or more that was concordant with (in the same direction as) the QRS complex; ST-segment depression of 1 mm or more in lead V1, V2, or V3; and ST-segment elevation of 5 mm or more that was disconcordant with (in the opposite direction from) the QRS complex. We used these three criteria in a multivariate model to develop a scoring system (0 to 10), which allowed a highly specific diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction to be made. CONCLUSIONS We developed and validated a clinical prediction rule based on a set of electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle-branch block. The use of these criteria, which are based on simple ST-segment changes, may help identify patients with acute myocardial infarction, who can then receive appropriate treatment.

[1]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Johan Herlitz,et al.  Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction : collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients , 1994 .

[3]  J. Edwards,et al.  Electrocardiographic Changes in Acute Subendocardial Infarction: I. Large Subendocardial and Large Nontransmural Infarcts , 1958, Circulation.

[4]  M. Rubenfire,et al.  The Clinical Significance of Bundle Branch Block Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1978, Circulation.

[5]  A. Pelberg.  Missed Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Room , 1989, Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians.

[6]  J. Pantridge.  Observations on the Electrocardiogram and Ventricular Gradient in Complete Left Bundle Branch Block , 1951, Circulation.

[7]  R. Weiner,et al.  Identification of myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block: Correlation of electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, and angiography , 1983, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[8]  Is diagnostic certainty essential for the use of thrombolytic therapy during myocardial infarction in the 1990s? , 1990, Circulation.

[9]  E F Cook,et al.  Ruling out acute myocardial infarction. A prospective multicenter validation of a 12-hour strategy for patients at low risk. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Ross,et al.  The electrocardiogram in patients undergoing thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. , 1987, Circulation.

[11]  J S Martin,et al.  Accuracy of computer-interpreted electrocardiography in selecting patients for thrombolytic therapy. MITI Project Investigators. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  E. Topol,et al.  Selection of patients with acute myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  B. Modan,et al.  Disposition of presumed coronary patients from an emergency room. A follow-up study. , 1976, JAMA.

[14]  J. Korewicki,et al.  The effect of infarct size on atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disturbances in acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, International journal of cardiology.

[15]  S. Ben Freedman,et al.  ST-segment changes during transmural myocardial ischemia in chronic left bundle branch block. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  S. Sclarovsky,et al.  Ischemic blocks during early phase of anterior myocardial infarction: Correlation with st‐segment shift , 1988, Clinical cardiology.

[17]  R. Hamby,et al.  Left bundle branch block: a predictor of poor left ventricular function in coronary artery disease. , 1983, American Heart Journal.

[18]  R Roberts,et al.  Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria for recognition of acute myocardial infarction based on analysis of 3,697 patients. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study. , 1993, Annals of emergency medicine.

[20]  H. Sox,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  R. Kleiger,et al.  Electrocardiographic evolution of posterior acute myocardial infarction: importance of early precordial ST-segment depression. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  J. L. Willems,et al.  Criteria for intraventricular conduction disturbances and pre-excitation. World Health Organizational/International Society and Federation for Cardiology Task Force Ad Hoc. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  L. T. Sheffield,et al.  Bundle branch block in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: angiographic correlates and prognostic significance. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  R. M. Rubison,et al.  Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. , 1994, Circulation.

[25]  E. Cook,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of complete left bundle branch block. , 1988, American heart journal.

[26]  M. Besoaín-Santander,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in cases of complete left bundle branch block , 1960 .

[27]  R. Califf,et al.  The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 1992, Chest.

[28]  N. Flowers.  Left bundle branch block: a continuously evolving concept. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  F. Wackers,et al.  Complete left bundle branch block: is the diagnosis of myocardial infarction possible? , 1983, International journal of cardiology.

[30]  P Schweitzer,et al.  The electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. , 1990, American heart journal.

[31]  M. LEE PEARCE,et al.  Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle‐Branch Block , 1957, Circulation.

[32]  Use of a rapid assay of subforms of creatine kinase MB to diagnose or rule out acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  L. Goldman,et al.  Candidates for thrombolysis among emergency room patients with acute chest pain. Potential true- and false-positive rates. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[34]  T O Stair,et al.  Litigation against the emergency physician: common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[35]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  E. Veys,et al.  HL-A AND INFECTIVE SACROILEITIS , 1974 .

[37]  S. Kaul,et al.  Value of regional wall motion abnormality in the emergency room diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. A prospective study using two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1991, Circulation.

[38]  F. Wackers.  The diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block. , 1987, Cardiology clinics.

[39]  S. Kaul,et al.  Importance of Two‐dimensional Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Room With Cardiac‐Related Symptoms , 1991, Circulation.

[40]  T. Walsh,et al.  A vectorcardiographic and electrocardiographic study of left bundle branch block with myocardial infarction. , 1966, The American journal of cardiology.

[41]  M A Hlatky,et al.  Clinical data bases. Accomplishments and unrealized potential. , 1985, Medical care.

[42]  B. Psaty,et al.  Predictors of myocardial infarction in emergency room patients , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[43]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  R. Califf,et al.  Mortality Within 24 Hours of Thrombolysis for Myocardial Infarction: The Importance of Early Reperfusion , 1994, Circulation.

[45]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Bundle branch block. , 1984, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[46]  M. Krucoff,et al.  Quantification of ST-segment changes during coronary angioplasty in patients with left bundle branch block. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[47]  M. Prinzmetal,et al.  Myocardial infarction complicated by left bundle branch block: studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. XI. , 1956, American heart journal.

[48]  R E Ideker,et al.  Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. V. Specificity and method of application of the complete system. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.