From Regular to Context Free to Mildly Context Sensitive Tree Rewriting Systems: The Path of Child Language Acquisition

Current syntactic theory limits the range of grammatical variation so severely that the logical problem of grammar learning is trivial. Yet, children exhibit characteristic stages in syntactic development at least through their sixth year. Rather than positing maturational delays, I suggest that acquisition difficulties are the result of limitations in manipulating grammatical representations. I argue that the genesis of complex sentences reflects increasing generative capacity in the systems generating structural descriptions: conjoined clauses demand only a regular tree rewriting system; sentential embedding uses a context-free tree substitution grammar; modification requires TAG, a mildly context-sensitive system.

[1]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Handling coordina-tion in a tree adjoining grammar , 1996 .

[2]  F. Grosjean.  Language and Cognitive Processes , 1996 .

[3]  S. Kapur,et al.  On the use of triggers in parameter setting , 1996 .

[4]  Robert Frank,et al.  GENERALIZED TRANSFORMATIONS AND THE THEORY OF GRAMMAR , 1995 .

[5]  Richard C. Waters,et al.  Tree Insertion Grammar: A Cubic-Time, Parsable Formalism that Lexicalizes Context-Free Grammar without Changing the Trees Produced , 1995, CL.

[6]  Owen C. Ranbow,et al.  Formal and computational aspects of natural language syntax , 1994 .

[7]  James Rogers.  Capturing CFLs with Tree Adjoining Grammars , 1994, ACL.

[8]  Karin Harbusch.  Incremental natural-language processing with schema-tree adjoining grammars , 1994 .

[9]  C. Thiersch.  On some formal properties of coordination , 1994 .

[10]  Esther Dromi,et al.  Language and cognition : a developmental perspective , 1993 .

[11]  ALAN MUNN,et al.  A NULL OPERATOR ANALYSIS OF ATB GAPS , 1992 .

[12]  Robert Frank,et al.  Syntactic locality and tree adjoining grammar: grammatical, acquisition and processing perspectives , 1992 .

[13]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Mathematical and computational aspects of lexicalized grammars , 1990 .

[14]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  The Processing and Acquisition of Control Structures by Young Children , 1990 .

[15]  David J. Weir,et al.  The convergence of mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms , 1990 .

[16]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Processing crossed and nested dependencies: An automation perspective on the psycholinguistic results , 1990 .

[17]  Hagit Borer,et al.  The Maturation of Syntax , 1987 .

[18]  Anthony S. Kroch,et al.  Unbounded Dependencies and Subjacency in a Tree Adjoining Grammar , 1987 .

[19]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  An Introduction to Tree Adjoining Grammar , 1987 .

[20]  Helen Smith Cairns,et al.  The development of grammars underlying children's interpretation of complex sentences , 1985, Cognition.

[21]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[22]  Henry Hamburger,et al.  Acquisition of cognitive compiling , 1984, Cognition.

[23]  David R. Dowty.  Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar , 1982 .

[24]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[25]  Susan L. Tavakolian,et al.  Language acquisition and linguistic theory , 1981 .

[26]  L. Bloom,et al.  Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode , 1980, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  Helen Goodluck,et al.  Linguistic principles in children's grammar of complement subject interpretation , 1978 .

[28]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Tree Adjunct Grammars , 1975, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..