Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the implant master cast according to the type (pick-up, transfer) and the length (long, short) of the impression copings. MATERIALS AND METHODS The metal master cast was fabricated with three internal connection type implant analogs (Osstem GS III analog), embedded parallel and with 10° of mesial angulation to the center analog. Four types of impression coping were prepared with different combinations of types (transfer, pick-up) and lengths (long, short) of the coping. The impressions were made using vinyl polysiloxane (one step, heavy + light body) with an individual tray, and 10 impressions were made for each group. Eventually, 40 experimental casts were produced. Then, the difference in the distance between the master cast and the experimental cast were measured, and the error rate was determined. The analysis of variance was performed using the SPSS (v 12.0) program (α = .05), and the statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS The ANOVA showed that the pick-up type impression coping exhibited a significantly lower error rate than the transfer type. However, no significant difference was observed with respect to the length of the impression coping. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the parallel and mesial angulated groups. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, the pick-up type impression coping exhibited a more accurate implant master cast than the transfer type in parallel group. The accuracy of the implant master cast did not differ for different lengths of impression coping of at least 11 mm. Additionally, the accuracy of the implant cast was not different for the parallel and 10° mesial angulated groups.

[1]  K. Hertrampf,et al.  Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[3]  Chang-Whe Kim,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  Heather J. Conrad,et al.  Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  B R Lang,et al.  Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  M G Barrett,et al.  The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. , 1993, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[7]  Changyong Feng,et al.  Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  P. Branemark Osseointegration and its experimental background. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  D Assif,et al.  Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. , 1992, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[10]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  Comparison of interface relationships between implant components for laser-welded titanium frameworks and standard cast frameworks. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  A B Carr,et al.  The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  Alvin G. Wee Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: in vivo study in rabbits. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[14]  J I Nicholls,et al.  Tolerance measurements of various implant components. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  T Jemt,et al.  Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  A B Carr,et al.  Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  C. Ercoli,et al.  The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  Leslie Howe,et al.  Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  G C Michaels,et al.  Effect of prosthetic superstructure accuracy on the osteointegrated implant bone interface. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[20]  B Rangert,et al.  Forces and moments on Branemark implants. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  H. G. Filho,et al.  Evaluation of Transfer Impressions for Osseointegrated Implants at Various Angulations , 2004, Implant dentistry.

[22]  A B Carr,et al.  The accuracy of implant verification casts compared with casts produced from a rigid transfer coping technique. , 1996, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.