Firm-specific intangible assets and subsidiary profitability: The moderating role of distance, ownership strategy and subsidiary experience

How does distance attenuate the value of MNC parent intangible assets on affiliate profitability? Beyond the basic assumption of internalization theory about the positive relationship between parent intangibles and foreign affiliate performance, we test how this relationship, is contingent on ownership strategy, subsidiary experience, and is moderated by the distance between home and host economies, in terms of differences in technological capacity, intellectual property regimes, economic development, language and geography. Based on newly-available accounting data on intangible assets, we test hypotheses on a sample of over 2000 multinationals and 5000 of their overseas affiliates in 45 home and host economies.

[1]  Stephen Chen,et al.  The importance of language in global teams: A linguistic perspective , 2006 .

[2]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2015 .

[3]  J. Johanson,et al.  THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE FIRM — FOUR SWEDISH CASES , 1975 .

[4]  N. Driffield,et al.  Multinational Performance and the Geography of FDI , 2013 .

[5]  K. Head,et al.  The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade , 2004 .

[6]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Information Technology and Distance-Induced Effort to Manage Offshore Activities , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[7]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The geographic scope of the MNC and its alliance portfolio: Resolving the paradox of distance , 2011 .

[8]  J. Larimo,et al.  Challenging the Conceptualization and Measurement of Distance and International Experience in Entry Mode Choice Research , 2009 .

[9]  F. Contractor Why Do Multinational Firms Exist? A Theory Note About The Effect of Multinational Expansion on Performance and Recent Methodological Critiques , 2012 .

[10]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[11]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Survival and Profitability: The Roles of Experience and Intangible Assets in Foreign Subsidiary Performance , 2002 .

[12]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Geography, Networks, and Knowledge Flow , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Reconceptualizing cultural distance: The role of cultural experience reserve in cross-border acquisitions , 2016 .

[14]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers , 2004 .

[15]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years , 2009 .

[16]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations , 2008 .

[17]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Ownership Strategy of Japanese Firms: Transactional, Institutional and Experience Influences , 1999 .

[18]  T. E. Stephenson Organization Development: A Critique. , 1975 .

[19]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[20]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[21]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[22]  Yadong Luo,et al.  From “Distance” to “Friction”: Substituting Metaphors and Redirecting Intercultural Research , 2008 .

[23]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions , 2012 .

[24]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Ownership Strategies and Survival of Foreign Subsidiaries: Impacts of Institutional Distance and Experience , 2007 .

[25]  J. Markusen The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade , 1995 .

[26]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Institutions, Resources, and Internationalization of Emerging Economy Firms , 2013 .

[27]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations , 2009 .

[28]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  The theory of the multinational enterprise , 1985 .

[29]  Yong Yang,et al.  Globalised Labour Markets? International Rent Sharing Across 47 Countries , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  J. Hennart,et al.  Transaction Cost Theory and International Business , 2010 .

[31]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The Antecedents of Psychic Distance , 2010 .

[32]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[33]  M. Russel,et al.  International patent protection. , 1985, Trends & techniques in the contemporary dental laboratory.

[34]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[35]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences , 2001 .

[36]  Roberto Ragozzino,et al.  The Effects of Geographic Distance on the Foreign Acquisition Activity of U.S. Firms , 2009 .

[37]  Srilata Zaheer Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness , 1995 .

[38]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Geographic Distance and Corporate Acquisitions: Signals from IPO Firms , 2011 .

[39]  Yong Yang,et al.  Firm Performance and the Geography of FDI: Evidence from 46 Countries , 2010 .

[40]  Srilata Zaheer,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF THE LIABILITY OF FOREIGNNESS: A GLOBAL STUDY OF SURVIVAL IN FINANCIAL SERVICES , 1997 .

[41]  N. Driffield,et al.  Reverse international knowledge transfer in the MNE : (where) does affiliate performance boost parent performance? , 2016 .

[42]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[43]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Liability of Foreignness and Internationalization of Emerging Market Firms , 2011 .

[44]  David Hummels,et al.  International Pricing in a Generalized Model of Ideal Variety , 2009 .

[45]  Walter G. Park,et al.  International patent protection: 1960-2005 , 2008 .

[46]  Guifang Yang,et al.  Intellectual property rights, foreign direct investment and competition issues in developing countries , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[47]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance , 2007 .

[48]  S. Hymer international operations of national firms , 1976 .

[49]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[50]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[51]  M. Nyaw,et al.  Mitigating liabilities of foreignness : defensive versus offensive approaches , 2002 .

[52]  Koen De Backer,et al.  The OECD ORBIS Database: Responding to the Need for Firm-Level Micro-Data in the OECD , 2010 .

[53]  Phillip McCalman Foreign direct investment and intellectual property rights: evidence from Hollywood's global distribution of movies and videos , 2004 .

[54]  Denice Welch,et al.  Language: The forgotten factor in multinational management , 1997 .

[55]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  UNPACKING INTERUNIT KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES , 2015 .

[56]  William K. Hutchinson,et al.  “Linguistic Distance” as a Determinant of Bilateral Trade , 2005 .

[57]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct , 2012 .

[58]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  An institutional approach to cross-national distance , 2010 .

[59]  Belén Villalonga Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences , 2004 .

[60]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[61]  John M. Mezias How to identify liabilities of foreignness and assess their effects on multinational corporations , 2002 .

[62]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. , 1995 .

[63]  M. Casson,et al.  The Future of the Multinational Enterprise after 30 Years , 2010 .

[64]  Christos Pantzalis,et al.  Does Location Matter? An Empirical Analysis of Geographic Scope and MNC Market Valuation , 2001 .

[65]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[66]  N. Driffield,et al.  Multinationality-Performance Relationship , 2012 .

[67]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Governance Structure, Innovation and Internationalization: Evidence from India , 2013 .

[68]  John H. Dunning,et al.  International production and the multinational enterprise , 1981 .

[69]  Douglas Dow,et al.  Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli , 2006 .

[70]  R. Evenson,et al.  Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change , 2003 .

[71]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Firm in a World of Outsourcing and Offshoring: The Organizational and Geographical Relocation of High-Value Company Functions , 2010 .

[72]  Philippe Gugler,et al.  Book reviewWorld Investment Report 2014: Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan, UNCTAD, United Nations, Geneva (2014) , 2015 .

[73]  P. Brewer Operationalizing Psychic Distance: A Revised Approach , 2007 .

[74]  F. Contractor,et al.  Modal Choice in a World of Alliances: Analyzing Organizational Forms in the International Hotel Sector , 1998 .

[75]  Moshe Farjoun,et al.  The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification , 1998 .

[76]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[77]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  The language barrier and its implications for HQ‐subsidiary relationships , 2008 .

[78]  Jens Beckert Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change* , 2010 .

[79]  Minyuan Zhao,et al.  Doing R & D in Countries with Weak IPR Protection : Can Corporate Management Substitute for Legal Institutions ? , 2004 .