Distortion of sonic bangs by atmospheric turbulence

Recorded pressure signatures of supersonic aircraft often show intense, spiky perturbations superimposed on a basic N -shaped pattern. A first-order scattering theory, incorporating both inertial and thermal interactions, is developed to explain the spikes. Scattering from a weak shock is studied first. The solution of the scattering equation is derived as a sum of three terms: a phase shift corresponding to the singularity found by Lighthill; a small local compression or rarefaction; a surface integral over a paraboloid of dependence, whose focus is the observation point and whose directrix is the shock. The solution is found to degenerate at the shock into the result given by ray acoustics, and the surface integral is identified with the scattered waves that make up the spikes. The solution is generalized for arbitrary wave-forms by means of a superposition integral. Eddies in the Kolmogorov inertial subrange are found to be the main source of spikes, and Kolmogorov's similarity theory is used to show that, for almost all times t after a sonic-bang shock passes an observation point, the mean-square pressure perturbation equals $(\Delta p)^2 (t_c/t)^{\frac{7}{6}}$ , where Δ p is the pressure jump across the shock and t c is a critical time predicted in terms of meteorological conditions. For an idealized model of the atmospheric boundary layer, t c is calculated to be about 1 ms, a figure consistent with the qualitative data currently available. The mean-square pressure perturbation just behind the shock itself is found to be finite but enormous, according to first-order scattering theory. It is conjectured that a second-order theory might explain the shock thickening that actually occurs.

[1]  C.H.E. Warren,et al.  Physical characteristics of the sonic bangs and other events at exercise Westminster , 1965 .

[2]  G. Whitham The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile , 1952 .

[3]  A. Townsend,et al.  Turbulent flow in a stably stratified atmosphere , 1958, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  H. W. Carlson,et al.  Experimental and analytic research on sonic boom generation at NASA , 1967 .

[5]  A. M. Binnie,et al.  The flow of swirling water through a convergentdivergent nozzle , 1957, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  A. Sigalla,et al.  Effects of Atmosphere and Aircraft Motion on the Location and Intensity of a Sonic Boom , 1963 .

[7]  D. J. Maglieri,et al.  A summary of results on sonic-boom pressure signature variations associated with atmospheric conditions , 1968 .

[8]  E. Kane,et al.  METEOROLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE SONIC BOOM , 1964 .

[9]  M. J. Lighthill,et al.  On the energy scattered from the interaction of turbulence with sound or shock waves , 1953, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  A. J. Barret,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume I . R. Courant and D. Hilbert. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York. 550 pp. Index. 75s. net. , 1954, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[11]  G. Batchelor,et al.  The theory of homogeneous turbulence , 1954 .

[12]  Visco‐Elastic Character of Fine‐Grained Isotropic Turbulence , 1967 .

[13]  P. Bradshaw Calculation of boundary-layer development using the turbulent energy equation , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  H. L. Grant,et al.  Turbulence spectra from a tidal channel , 1962, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  G. B. Whitham,et al.  On the propagation of weak shock waves , 1956, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.