Real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses magnetic navigation, improves the sonographic identification of enhancing lesions on breast MRI.

This study verified that recently developed real-time virtual sonography (RVS) to coordinate a sonography image and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) with magnetic navigation was useful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of RVS to sonographically identify enhancing lesions by breast MRI. Between December 2008 and May 2009, RVS was performed in 51 consecutive patients with 63 enhancing lesions. MRI was performed with the patients in the supine position using a 1.5-T imager with a body surface coil to achieve the same position as with sonography. To assess the accuracy of the RVS, the following three issues were analyzed: (i) The sonographic detection rate of enhancing lesions, (ii) the comparison of the tumor size measured by sonography and the MRI-MPR and (iii) the positioning errors as the distance from the actual sonographic position to the expected MRI position in 3-D. Among the 63 enhancing lesions, 42 (67%) lesions were identified by conventional B-mode, whereas the remaining 21 (33%) initial conventional B-mode occult lesions were identified by RVS alone. The sonographic size of the lesions detected by RVS alone was significantly smaller than that of lesions detected by conventional B-mode (p < 0.001). The mean tumor size provided by RVS was 12.3 mm for real-time sonography and 14.1 mm for MRI-MPR (r = 0.848, p < 0.001). The mean positioning errors for the transverse and sagittal planes and the depth from the skin were 7.7, 6.9 and 2.8 mm, respectively. The overall mean 3D positioning error was 12.0 mm. Our results suggest that RVS has good targeting accuracy to directly compare a sonographic image with MRI results without operator dependence.

[1]  D Krebs,et al.  Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. , 2000, Radiology.

[2]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. , 2006, Radiology.

[4]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. , 2006, Radiology.

[5]  H. Sittek,et al.  Magnetic resonance‐guided, vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy , 2006, Cancer.

[6]  Hepatic Computed Tomography for Simultaneous Depiction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Intrahepatic Portal Veins, and Hepatic Veins in Real‐time Virtual Sonography , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  S. Heywang-Köbrunner,et al.  Multicenter Comparative Multimodality Surveillance of Women at Genetic-Familial High Risk for Breast Cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim Results , 2008 .

[8]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Oka,et al.  Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Breast Cancer Patients by Real‐Time Virtual Sonography Constructed With Three‐Dimensional Computed Tomography‐Lymphography , 2010, The breast journal.

[11]  Kazuko Ohno,et al.  Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience. , 2009, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[12]  L. Liberman,et al.  MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  Laura Cortesi,et al.  Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. , 2007, Radiology.

[15]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2008, Breast.

[16]  N. Hylton,et al.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. , 2006, Radiology.

[17]  T. Nims,et al.  Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[18]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. , 2003, Radiology.

[19]  D. Fraker,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions. , 2002 .

[20]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  T. J. Eberlein Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Projection and Reproduction Techniques of Surgical-Position Breast MRI in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast , 2009 .

[22]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[23]  R. Birdwell Preliminary In Vivo Validation of a Dedicated Breast MRI and Sonographic Coregistration Imaging System , 2009 .

[24]  M. Tozaki,et al.  Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. , 2006, Breast.