General Multistage Gatekeeping Procedures

A general multistage (stepwise) procedure is proposed for dealing with arbitrary gatekeeping problems including parallel and serial gatekeeping. The procedure is very simple to implement since it does not require the application of the closed testing principle and the consequent need to test all nonempty intersections of hypotheses. It is based on the idea of carrying forward the Type I error rate for any rejected hypotheses to test hypotheses in the next ordered family. This requires the use of a so-called separable multiple test procedure (MTP) in the earlier family. The Bonferroni MTP is separable, but other standard MTPs such as Holm, Hochberg, Fallback and Dunnett are not. Their truncated versions are proposed which are separable and more powerful than the Bonferroni MTP. The proposed procedure is illustrated by a clinical trial example.

[1]  G. Hommel.  A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test , 1988 .

[2]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  Gatekeeping procedures with clinical trial applications , 2007, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[3]  Arthur J Roth,et al.  Multiple comparison procedures for discrete test statistics , 1999 .

[4]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Analysis of clinical trial data using SAS: A practical guide , 2005 .

[5]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Comparison of Methods for the Computation of Multivariate t Probabilities , 2002 .

[6]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Erratum: Tree structured gatekeeping tests in clinical trials with hierarchically ordered multiple objectives (Statistics in Medicine (2007) vol. 26 (2465-2478)) , 2008 .

[7]  A. Tamhane,et al.  A note on tree gatekeeping procedures in clinical trials , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  C. Dunnett.  A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control , 1955 .

[9]  Olivier Guilbaud,et al.  Bonferroni Parallel Gatekeeping – Transparent Generalizations, Adjusted P ‐values, and Short Direct Proofs , 2007, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[10]  B. Wiens,et al.  The Fallback Procedure for Evaluating a Single Family of Hypotheses , 2005, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[11]  R. Simes,et al.  An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1986 .

[12]  P. Sen.  Some remarks on Simes-type multiple tests of significance , 1999 .

[13]  Xin Wang,et al.  Stepwise Gatekeeping Procedures in Clinical Trial Applications , 2006, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[14]  B. Wiens.  A fixed sequence Bonferroni procedure for testing multiple endpoints , 2003 .

[15]  P. Westfall,et al.  Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  S. Sarkar,et al.  The Simes Method for Multiple Hypothesis Testing with Positively Dependent Test Statistics , 1997 .

[17]  Xin Wang,et al.  Tree‐structured gatekeeping tests in clinical trials with hierarchically ordered multiple objectives , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[19]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  Analysis of Clinical Trials Using SAS: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[20]  W. Brannath,et al.  Recursive Combination Tests , 2002 .

[21]  K. Gabriel,et al.  On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance , 1976 .

[22]  A. Dmitrienko,et al.  Gatekeeping procedures in dose–response clinical trials based on the Dunnett test , 2006, Pharmaceutical statistics.