Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect

OBJECTIVES Spatial neglect may result from disruption of sensory-attentional systems that spatially allocate perceptual resources and the motor-intentional systems that direct exploration and action. Previous studies have suggested that the line bisection task is more sensitive to sensory-attentional disorders and the cancellation task to motor-intentional disorders. A new technique was developed that allows the dissociation of sensory-attentional and motor-intentional deficits in both tasks and thereby allows comparison of these tasks. METHODS Ten patients with right hemispheric injury and hemispatial neglect performed line bisection and cancellation tasks while viewing stimuli on closed circuit TV. Direct view of the exploring hand and the target was precluded; the TV monitor guided performance. The direct condition made the direction of hand movement on the table (workspace) congruent with that on the monitor. Inverting the camera produced the indirect condition wherein the lateral movement in the workspace occurred in the opposite direction on the monitor. RESULTS On the cancellation task, five patients marked targets in the right workspace in the direct condition but the left workspace in the indirect condition, indicating sensory-attentional neglect. However, four other patients cancelled targets only in the right workspace in both conditions, failing to explore the left workspace, suggesting motor-intentional neglect. A patient who performed ambiguously may have elements of both types of neglect. Only two out of five patients designated as sensory-attentional in cancellation tasks showed sensory neglect on line bisection. The other three patients, as well as patients defined as motor-intentional by cancellation performance, exhibited motor-intentional neglect on line bisection. CONCLUSION The designation of sensory-attentional versus motor-intentional neglect therefore, in part, depends on task specific demands.

[1]  K M Heilman,et al.  A comparison of the influences of body and environment centred reference frames on neglect. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  K M Heilman,et al.  Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[3]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Dissociated neglect behavior following sequential strokes in the right hemisphere , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[4]  E. Làdavas The role of visual attention in neglect: A dissociation between perceptual and directional motor neglect , 1994 .

[5]  Charles M. Butter,et al.  Altitudinal Neglect Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report , 1989, Cortex.

[6]  J. Marshall,et al.  Is neglect (only) lateral? A quadrant analysis of line cancellation. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[7]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect of near peripersonal space. Evidence for multidirectional attentional systems in humans. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Spatial Bias , 1997, Neurology.

[9]  J. Binder,et al.  Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[10]  R. Tegnér,et al.  Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  D. Neary Lesion Analysis in Neuropsychology , 1990 .

[12]  K M Heilman,et al.  Directional hypokinesia and hemispatial inattention in neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  M. Albert A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[14]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[15]  Mark Mennemeier,et al.  Search patterns and neglect: A case study , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  C Luzzatti,et al.  Unilateral neglect, representational schema and consciousness. , 1979, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[18]  A. Milner,et al.  An Investigation of Hemispatial Neglect Using the Landmark Task , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  M. L. Rusconi,et al.  Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect , 1990, Neurology.

[20]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Left Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Meaningless Entity? , 1992, Cortex.

[21]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[22]  D. Pandya,et al.  Cortico-cortical connections in the rhesus monkey. , 1969, Brain research.

[23]  J. Marshall,et al.  Perceptual cueing and perceptuo-motor compatibility in visuo-spatial neglect: A single case study , 1989 .

[24]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Hemispatial neglect affected by non‐neglected stimuli , 1988, Neurology.

[25]  K M Heilman,et al.  Peripersonal and vertical neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  D L Na,et al.  Neglect of radial and vertical space: importance of the retinotopic reference frame. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  H. Tsukagoshi,et al.  Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  A. Milner,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of spatial neglect , 1994 .

[29]  K. Heilman,et al.  Altitudinal neglect , 1988, Neurology.