Effects of caption and gender on junior high students' EFL learning from iMap-enhanced contextualized learning

Abstract With the global positioning function, mobile learning technology extends the capacity of modern learning to fulfill location-based learning for learners to learn everywhere contextually. This study developed a digital interactive geographic map (iMap) with GPS function to support location-based contextualized EFL learning. Four classes of ninth-graders from a junior high school voluntarily participated in the 2-session 70-min learning activities using tablet PCs. Two experimental groups (non-caption vs. English-caption) were implemented, and the effects of caption and gender on learning performance and motivation were examined. The results showed that the caption*gender interaction was significant on learning performance, and the male non-caption group outperformed the male English-caption group, while the female learners in both groups performed equally. As for motivation, the participants demonstrated positive motivation in all aspects (i.e., self-efficacy, proactive learning, learning value, achievement goal and environmental incentive), and the non-caption group showed higher degrees of motivation in self-efficacy, learning value and environmental incentive than the English-caption group, while the gender effect was non-significant on these motivation aspects. Furthermore, the caption*gender interaction on proactive learning and achievement goal indicated that captions tended to interfere male learners’ learning intention and sense of achievement, suggesting that the adaption of learning strategies to individual traits and gender differences is imperative. This research extends the investigation on issues concerning the application of iMap-enhanced contextualized learning to the research field of technology-enhanced language learning, and the findings further support the argument that contextualized learning induces high motivation and assists learners in language comprehension and application.

[1]  Celeste Kinginger,et al.  Learning Chinese through Contextualized Language Practices in Study Abroad Residence Halls: Two Case Studies , 2018, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[2]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Flipped Contextual Game-Based Learning Approach to Enhancing EFL Students' English Business Writing Performance and Reflective Behaviors , 2018, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Baloglu,et al.  Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. , 2003 .

[4]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[5]  Olga Viberg,et al.  Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  Piet Desmet,et al.  Enhancing Vocabulary Learning Through Captioned Video: An Eye-Tracking Study , 2015 .

[7]  Hee-Jung Jung UBIQUITOUS LEARNING: DETERMINANTS IMPACTING LEARNERS' SATISFACTION AND PERFORMANCE WITH SMARTPHONES , 2014 .

[8]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Computer-assisted foreign language learning: Effects of text, context, and gender on listening comprehension and motivation , 1995 .

[9]  Mohammed Ali Mohsen The use of help options in multimedia listening environments to aid language learning: A review , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Mila Vulchanova,et al.  As naturalistic as it gets: subtitles in the English classroom in Norway , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[11]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[12]  Martine Danan,et al.  Captioning and Subtitling: Undervalued Language Learning Strategies , 2004 .

[13]  Lawrence Jun Zhang,et al.  Evaluating ELT multimedia courseware from the perspective of cognitive theory of multimedia learning , 2017 .

[14]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Feeling good, learning better? Effectivity of an emotional design procedure in multimedia learning , 2018, Educational Psychology.

[15]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  The effectiveness of a meaningful learning-based evaluation model for context-aware mobile learning , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[16]  Lung-Hsiang Wong,et al.  Towards a seamless language learning framework mediated by the ubiquitous technology , 2012, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[17]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[18]  Janina Brutt-Griffler,et al.  In their own voices: Development of English as a gender-neutral language , 2017, English Today.

[19]  Helen Crompton,et al.  The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Rosa María Jiménez Catalán,et al.  Gender Tendencies in EFL across Vocabulary Tests , 2010 .

[21]  Gregory Taylor,et al.  Perceived Processing Strategies of Students Watching Captioned Video , 2005 .

[22]  Piet Swanepoel,et al.  Theoretical and Methodological Pluralism in Designing Effective Lexical Support for CALL , 2003 .

[23]  Sybille Heinzmann "Girls are better at language learning than boys": Do stereotypic beliefs about language learning contribute to girls' higher motivation to learn English in primary school? , 2009 .

[24]  Ann Phoenix Neoliberalism and Masculinity , 2004 .

[25]  R. Mayer Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[26]  Uta K. Bindl,et al.  Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation , 2010 .

[27]  Michael DeCesare,et al.  “Statistics Anxiety” Among Sociology Majors , 2007 .

[28]  Wim Van Den Noortgate,et al.  Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis , 2013 .

[29]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Impacts of Different Smartphone Caption/Subtitle Mechanisms on English Listening Performance and Perceptions of Students with Different Learning Styles , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[30]  Ching-Kun Hsu,et al.  Learning motivation and adaptive video caption filtering for EFL learners using handheld devices , 2014, ReCALL.

[31]  Haoran Xie,et al.  Future trends and research issues of technology-enhanced language learning: A technological perspective , 2018, Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal.

[32]  Chia-Chen Chen,et al.  Learning in a u-Museum: Developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Jane Sunderland,et al.  Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education , 2000, Language Teaching.

[34]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[35]  Julia Dietrich,et al.  Stability and change in students' motivational profiles in mathematics classrooms: The role of perceived teaching , 2019, Teaching and Teacher Education.

[36]  Nan Jiang,et al.  Lexical representation and development in a second language , 2000 .

[37]  Joshua A. Cuevas,et al.  A test of two alternative cognitive processing models: Learning styles and dual coding , 2018 .

[38]  M. Balakumar,et al.  A review of multimedia glosses and their effects on L2 vocabulary acquisition in CALL literature , 2011, ReCALL.

[39]  Almudena Fernández Fontecha,et al.  Gender and Motivation in EFL Vocabulary Production , 2010 .

[40]  Monika Chavez Gender in the language classroom , 2000 .

[41]  Jie-Chi Yang,et al.  Learner perceptions of reliance on captions in EFL multimedia listening comprehension , 2014 .

[42]  Elizabeth FitzGerald,et al.  Creating user-generated content for location-based learning: an authoring framework , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[43]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[44]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents as Aids in Multimedia Learning: Effects on Eye-Fixations During Learning and Learning Outcomes , 2017 .

[45]  Jie-Chi Yang,et al.  Individual differences in an English learning achievement system: gaming flow experience, gender differences and learning motivation , 2018 .

[46]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[47]  Chaoyun Liang,et al.  Performance, cognitive load, and behaviour of technology-assisted English listening learning: From CALL to MALL , 2018, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[48]  Chi‐Chin Chin,et al.  The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning , 2005 .

[49]  Scott Kissau,et al.  Gender Differences in Motivation to Learn French , 2006 .

[50]  Mohammad Aliakbari,et al.  On the relationship between gender and perceptual language learning styles: the case of Iranian academic EFL learners , 2011 .

[51]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[52]  Michael P. H. Rodgers,et al.  The Effects of Captions on EFL Learners' Comprehension of English-Language Television Programs. , 2016 .

[53]  Carol Morgan,et al.  The relationship between gender and learning styles amongst A level modern languages students , 2001 .

[54]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Two kinds of meaningful multimedia learning: Is cognitive activity alone as good as combined behavioral and cognitive activity? , 2018 .

[55]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  Mohammad Aliakbari,et al.  Analytical/intuitive EFL learners and gender effect , 2010 .

[57]  Marije Michel,et al.  Eye-tracking research in computer-mediated language learning , 2017 .

[58]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer , 1999 .

[59]  Li-Chun Wang,et al.  The effects of game strategy and preference‐matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning , 2010 .

[60]  Nimet Unay Gundogan,et al.  The influence of digit ratio on the gender difference in learning style preferences , 2009 .

[61]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. , 2005 .

[62]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[63]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, interaction, and the second language learner , 1994 .

[64]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[65]  Szu-Yu Chen,et al.  Mindful learning: A mediator of mastery experience during digital creativity game-based learning among elementary school students , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[66]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities , 2010 .

[67]  Tsung-Yuan Hsiao,et al.  Gender differences in statistics anxiety among graduate students learning English as a foreign language , 2011 .

[68]  Stine Marie Spellerberg,et al.  L3 English acquisition in Denmark and Greenland: gender-related tendencies , 2011 .

[69]  Larry Vandergrift,et al.  1. LISTENING TO LEARN OR LEARNING TO LISTEN? , 2004, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[70]  Sedigheh Vahdat,et al.  The Effect of Video Games on Iranian EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning , 2013 .

[71]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Mobile-based collaborative learning in the fitness center: A case study on the development of English listening comprehension with a context-aware application , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[72]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  The effects of instructional methods on students' learning outcomes requiring different cognitive abilities: context-aware ubiquitous learning versus traditional instruction , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[73]  John Sweller,et al.  Redundancy and expertise reversal effects when using educational technology to learn primary school science , 2012 .

[74]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Rewarded and unrewarded competition in a CSCL environment: A coopetition design with a social cognitive perspective using PLS-SEM analyses , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[75]  Nadaleen Tempelman-Kluit Multimedia Learning Theories and Online Instruction , 2006 .

[76]  Akbar Bahari,et al.  FonF practice model from theory to practice: CALL via focus on form approach and non-linear dynamic motivation to develop listening and speaking proficiency , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[77]  Thomas D. Fletcher,et al.  Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[78]  Tina Seufert,et al.  The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load , 2018, Educational Research Review.

[79]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010-2016 based on the activity theory framework , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[80]  A. Ryan,et al.  Early Adolescents' Perceptions of the Classroom Social Environment, Motivational Beliefs, and Engagement. , 2007 .

[81]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. , 2008 .

[82]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  Motivation, Vision, and Gender: A Survey of Learners of English in China , 2016 .

[83]  Michael J. Middleton,et al.  Performance-Approach Goals: Good for What, for Whom, under What Circumstances, and at What Cost?. , 2001 .

[84]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  What Good is Educational Psychology? The Case of Cognition and Instruction , 2001 .

[85]  Tetyana Sydorenko,et al.  Modality of Input and Vocabulary Acquisition , 2010 .