Birefringence, dimensionality, and surface influences on organic hybrid electro-optic performance

Hybrid organic electro-optic (OEO) devices consist of a layer of ordered organic chromophores confined between layers of metals or semiconductors, enabling optical fields to be tightly confined within the OEO material. The combination of tight confinement with the high electro-optic (EO) performance of state-of-the art OEO materials enables exceptional electro-optic switching performance in silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) and plasmonic-organic hybrid (POH) device architectures. Recent records in POH devices include bandwidths < 500 GHz and energy efficiency < 100 aJ/bit. However, optimization of device performance requires both understanding and improving the degree to which chromophores can be acentrically ordered near a metal or semiconductor interface. Applying bulk and/or isotropic models of OEO materials to nanophotonic device architectures often lead to overly optimistic translation of materials performance to device performance. Prior work has identified influences of high centrosymmetric order (birefringence), altered relations between acentric and centrosymmetric order (dimensionality), and surface electrostatics on chromophore ordering. We combine these models into a representation that can be used to understand the influences of these phenomena on device performance, how some prior OEO materials exhibited unusually high performance under confinement, how ordering close to surfaces may be improved, and implications for future electro-optic device design.

[1]  Relation of system dimensionality and order parameters. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  Wolfgang Freude,et al.  Silicon–Organic and Plasmonic–Organic Hybrid Photonics , 2017 .

[3]  Bruce H. Robinson,et al.  Toward optimal EO response from ONLO chromophores: a statistical mechanics study of optimizing shape , 2016 .

[4]  Stephanie J. Benight Nanoengineering of Soft Matter Interactions in Organic Electro-Optic Materials , 2011 .

[5]  Mark G. Kuzyk,et al.  Second-order nonlinear-optical processes in orientationally ordered materials: relationship between molecular and macroscopic properties , 1987 .

[6]  J. Kirkwood The Dielectric Polarization of Polar Liquids , 1939 .

[7]  Bruce H. Robinson,et al.  Nano‐Engineering Lattice Dimensionality for a Soft Matter Organic Functional Material , 2012, Advanced materials.

[8]  Mark G. Kuzyk,et al.  Using fundamental principles to understand and optimize nonlinear-optical materials , 2009 .

[9]  Antao Chen,et al.  Measuring order in contact-poled organic electrooptic materials with variable-angle polarization-referenced absorption spectroscopy (VAPRAS). , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  K. Clays,et al.  Electro‐Optic Activity in Excess of 1000 pm V−1 Achieved via Theory‐Guided Organic Chromophore Design , 2021, Advanced materials.

[11]  Bruce H. Robinson,et al.  Modeling Chromophore Order: A Guide For Improving EO Performance , 2014 .

[12]  A. F. Tillack,et al.  Electro-Optic Material Design Criteria Derived from Condensed Matter Simulations Using the Level-of-Detail Coarse-Graining Approach , 2015 .

[13]  Ruimin Xu,et al.  Benzocyclobutene barrier layer for suppressing conductance in nonlinear optical devices during electric field poling , 2014 .

[14]  Bruce H. Robinson,et al.  Matrix-Assisted Poling of Monolithic Bridge-Disubstituted Organic NLO Chromophores , 2014 .

[15]  Larry R. Dalton,et al.  Theory-guided enhancement of poling efficiency of organic electro-optic materials , 2010, Organic Photonics + Electronics.

[16]  L. Dalton,et al.  Optimization of plasmonic-organic hybrid electro-optics , 2018, 2017 IEEE Avionics and Vehicle Fiber-Optics and Photonics Conference (AVFOP).

[17]  B. Eichinger,et al.  Dielectric constants of simple liquids: stockmayer and ellipsoidal fluids. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  L. Onsager Electric Moments of Molecules in Liquids , 1936 .

[19]  Robin Barnes,et al.  Reduced dimensionality in organic electro-optic materials: theory and defined order. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[20]  Larry R Dalton,et al.  Electric field poled organic electro-optic materials: state of the art and future prospects. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[21]  M. Lauermann,et al.  Ultra-high electro-optic activity demonstrated in a silicon-organic hybrid modulator , 2017, Optica.

[22]  P. Winzer,et al.  Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages , 2018, Nature.

[23]  K. Clays,et al.  Bis(4-dialkylaminophenyl)heteroarylamino donor chromophores exhibiting exceptional hyperpolarizabilities , 2021 .

[24]  Juerg Leuthold,et al.  Nonlinearities of organic electro-optic materials in nanoscale slots and implications for the optimum modulator design. , 2017, Optics express.

[25]  Zhang,et al.  Low (Sub-1-volt) halfwave voltage polymeric electro-optic modulators achieved by controlling chromophore shape , 2000, Science.

[26]  Martin Neumann,et al.  Dipole moment fluctuation formulas in computer simulations of polar systems , 1983 .

[27]  A. F. Tillack,et al.  Systematic Generation of Anisotropic Coarse-Grained Lennard-Jones Potentials and Their Application to Ordered Soft Matter. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[28]  Bruce H. Robinson,et al.  Systematic Nanoengineering of Soft Matter Organic Electro-optic Materials† , 2011 .

[29]  Bruce H. Robinson,et al.  Ultrahigh Electro-Optic Coefficients, High Index of Refraction, and Long-Term Stability from Diels–Alder Cross-Linkable Binary Molecular Glasses , 2020, Chemistry of Materials.

[30]  Bruce H. Robinson,et al.  Poling-induced birefringence in OEO materials under nanoscale confinement , 2018, Organic Photonics + Electronics.