Renal artery stenosis: functional assessment with dynamic MR perfusion measurements--feasibility study.

PURPOSE To prospectively assess feasibility of renal magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion measurement method based on turbo fast low-angle shot sequences for grading effect of renal artery stenosis (RAS) on parenchymal perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approved this study, and patients gave written consent. Seventy-three patients (34 male, 39 female; age range, 17-84 years) who were clinically suspected of having RAS underwent contrast material-enhanced (gadodiamide) saturation-recovery turbo fast low-angle shot imaging for measurement of renal perfusion and high-spatial-resolution MR angiography for RAS detection and grading. Degree of stenosis was evaluated as high grade (>/=75% stenosis), low to intermediate grade (>0% to <75% stenosis), or absent. High temporal resolution of the turbo fast low-angle shot sequence allowed acquisition of an exact first-pass tracing of the contrast agent bolus from which a signal intensity (SI)-time curve was derived. On the basis of this curve, mean transit time (MTT) of the contrast agent bolus, maximal upslope (MUS) of the curve, maximum SI, and time to SI peak (TTP) were calculated with a gamma variate fit. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson product moment correlation, and paired t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Twenty-four renal arteries had high-grade RAS, 12 renal arteries had low- to intermediate-grade RAS, and 104 renal arteries had no RAS. Significant differences between patients without stenoses or with low- to intermediate-grade stenoses and patients with high-grade stenoses were found for MTT, MUS, and TTP (P < .001). Perfusion parameters were correlated with patients' serum creatinine levels, and significant correlations were found for MTT (r = 0.41), MUS (r = 0.48), and TTP (r = 0.4), with P < .001. CONCLUSION MR perfusion parameters can be used to assess effect of RAS on parenchymal perfusion. Perfusion measurements reflect renal function as measured with serum creatinine levels.

[1]  C. Starmer,et al.  Indicator Transit Time Considered as a Gamma Variate , 1964, Circulation research.

[2]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  Treatment of Patients with Aortic Dissection Presenting with Peripheral Vascular Complications , 1990, Annals of surgery.

[3]  D. Le Guludec,et al.  Functional evaluation of normal and ischemic kidney by means of gadolinium-DOTA enhanced TurboFLASH MR imaging: a preliminary comparison with 99Tc-MAG3 dynamic scintigraphy. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  N J Pelc,et al.  Renal artery blood flow: quantitation with phase-contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  M. Knopp,et al.  Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[7]  M Bock,et al.  Noninvasive analysis of renal artery blood flow dynamics with MR cine phase-contrast flow measurements. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  P. Tofts.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  M. Prince.  Renal MR angiography: A comprehensive approach , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  M V Knopp,et al.  Arterial-phase three-dimensional gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries. Strategies for timing and contrast media injection: original investigation. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Peripheral Vessels: Different Contrast Agent Applications and Sequence Strategies , 1998 .

[12]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and first-pass renal perfusion imaging using MS-325, an intravascular contrast agent. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[13]  M. Reiser,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion using multisection first-pass MRI and color-coded parameter maps: a comparison to 99mTc Sesta MIBI SPECT and systolic myocardial wall thickening analysis. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  A. Charlesworth,et al.  Renal function, neurohormonal activation, and survival in patients with chronic heart failure. , 2000, Circulation.

[15]  M Bock,et al.  Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[16]  L. Lerman,et al.  Novel noninvasive techniques for studying renal function in man. , 2000, Seminars in nephrology.

[17]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Renal artery blood flow: quantification with breath-hold or respiratory triggered phase-contrast MR imaging , 2000, European Radiology.

[18]  J. Biederer,et al.  Quantitation of renal perfusion using arterial spin labeling with FAIR-UFLARE. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  Gerhard Laub,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced breath‐hold three‐dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: Optimization of technique and pitfalls , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  H Rusinek,et al.  MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility. , 2001, Radiology.

[21]  É. Mousseaux,et al.  Unilateral renal artery stenosis: perfusion patterns with electron-beam dynamic CT--preliminary experience. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Motion of the distal renal artery during three‐dimensional contrast‐enhanced breath‐hold MRA , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Max A Viergever,et al.  Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[25]  Michael V Knopp,et al.  Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[26]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Jacques Belenger,et al.  Noninvasive Measurement of Absolute Renal Perfusion by Contrast Medium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[28]  M. Bock,et al.  Quantification of renal perfusion abnormalities using an intravascular contrast agent (part 2): Results in animals and humans with renal artery stenosis , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[30]  J Graeme Houston,et al.  Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of renal cortex: A functional assessment of renovascular disease in patients with renal artery stenosis , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Metallic renal artery MR imaging stent: artifact-free lumen visualization with projection and standard renal MR angiography. , 2003, Radiology.

[32]  Michael Bock,et al.  Quantification of renal perfusion using an intravascular contrast agent (part 1): Results in a canine model , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  M. Bettmann,et al.  Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[34]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Flow Quantification in Renal Arteries: Comparison With 133Xenon Washout Measurements , 2003, Hypertension.

[35]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Renal MR angiography: current debates and developments in imaging of renal artery stenosis. , 2003, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[36]  H. Ehmke,et al.  Autoregulation of renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate and renin release in conscious dogs , 1987, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.