INFLUENCE OF THERMAL INSULATION ON THE ENERGY BALANCE FOR COLD-FORMED BUILDINGS

Two major factors contribute to the sustainability of buildings: material efficiency and energy efficiency. Material efficiency relates to the use of environmental-friendly materials and to the minimization of construction waste materials, either during construction and at the end-of-life stage of the building. Energy efficiency is currently understood as the optimization of the energy used during the operation stage of the building. This entails the energy needed for heating, cooling, lighting, etc. Often in order to improve the energy needs of a building, more insulation material is used, thus leading to a trade-off between embodied energy and operational energy. It is the aim of this paper to analyse and discuss the balance between the embodied energy and the operational energy for various levels of insulation, over its life cycle. The operational energy is estimated based on the simplified approach provided by the Portuguese Code of practice. The estimated operational energy is then balanced against the life cycle embodied energy of the system. Finally, the simplified approach for the calculation of the operational energy is confronted to more sophisticated dynamic simulations using the software EnergyPlus.

[1]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification , 2009 .

[2]  M. J. Holmes,et al.  Embodied and operational carbon dioxide emissions from housing: A case study on the effects of thermal mass and climate change , 2008 .

[3]  E. Gaylord,et al.  Design of Steel Structures , 1972 .

[4]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[5]  K. Adalberth,et al.  Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: a method , 1997 .

[6]  H. Manz,et al.  An empirical validation of window solar gain models and the associated interactions , 2009 .

[7]  K. Adalberth,et al.  Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: Examples , 1997 .

[8]  K. J Eaton,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of steel and concrete framed office buildings , 1997 .

[9]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[10]  Brian Norton,et al.  Life-cycle operational and embodied energy for a generic single-storey office building in the UK , 2002 .

[11]  Kristian Fabbri,et al.  Energy performance building evaluation in Mediterranean countries: Comparison between software simulations and operating rating simulation , 2008 .

[12]  Jon Hand,et al.  CONTRASTING THE CAPABILITIES OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATION PROGRAMS , 2008 .

[13]  Daniel E. Fisher,et al.  EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program , 2001 .

[14]  David Pearlmutter,et al.  A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert , 2008 .

[15]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[16]  Y. P. Singh,et al.  Comparative assessment of energy requirements for different types of residential buildings in India , 1995 .

[17]  S. Gheewala,et al.  Life cycle energy of single landed houses in Indonesia , 2008 .