Preferential Flow Revealed by Hydrologic Modeling Based on Predicted Hydraulic Properties

Pedotransfer functions have shown a reasonable reliability and accuracy for predicting soil hydraulic properties. However, the contribution of the range of macroscopic features leading to preferential water flow is not readily taken into account. We modified and used the hydrological component of the reactive transport model MIN3P and the neural network-based code ROSETTA in an attempt to simulate 4 yr of daily measurements of the soil water content in a forest soil covered by Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziessii Franco). A good fit of the mean measured water contents was obtained during periods of low soil moisture, while the model tended to overpredict water contents during periods of high soil moisture. This behavior is typical for the presence of significant preferential flow. Slightly better results were obtained by using predicted values of the saturated hydraulic conductivity, while the assumption of a water table located at shallow depth increased discrepancies. A good match was obtained by calibration of a simple preferential flow scheme, which was based on the assumption that the retention properties of the porous network control preferential flow. Accordingly, preferential flow seemed to initiate within the capillary pore domain. This causes a much greater sensitivity of the results to the position of the water table than with other schemes that consider pure gravity-driven flow in large macropores. Knowledge of the functional pore size is needed to ascertain the type of preferential flow scheme to be used.

[1]  Diederik Jacques,et al.  Indirect estimation of near-saturated hydraulic conductivity from readily available soil information , 2002 .

[2]  Kevin J. McInnes,et al.  Effects of Soil Morphology on Hydraulic Properties II. Hydraulic Pedotransfer Functions , 1999 .

[3]  Horst H. Gerke,et al.  Evaluation of a first-order water transfer term for variably saturated dual-porosity flow models , 1993 .

[4]  Richard E. Macur,et al.  Input parameter and model resolution effects on predictions of solute transport , 1996 .

[5]  S. Roulier,et al.  Analysis of Inverse Procedures for Estimating Parameters Controlling Macropore Flow and Solute Transport in the Dual-Permeability Model MACRO , 2003 .

[6]  David W. Blowes,et al.  Multicomponent reactive transport modeling in variably saturated porous media using a generalized formulation for kinetically controlled reactions , 2002 .

[7]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Cautionary notes on the use of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil hydraulic properties , 1996 .

[8]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model , 2001 .

[9]  J. Ranger,et al.  Forest soil dynamics during stand development assessed by lysimeter and centrifuge solutions , 2001 .

[10]  W. Bouten,et al.  Soil water dynamics and long-term water balances of a Douglas Fir stand in the Netherlands , 1994 .

[11]  B. Mohanty,et al.  New piecewise‐continuous hydraulic functions for modeling preferential flow in an intermittent‐flood‐irrigated field , 1997 .

[12]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[13]  J. Bouma,et al.  Combining pedotransfer functions with physical measurements to improve the estimation of soil hydraulic properties , 2001 .

[14]  A. Granier,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in a chronosequence of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb). Franco) stands on the Beaujolais Mounts (France). 2. Quantitative approach , 1997 .

[15]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Testing soil water retention estimation with the MUUF pedotransfer model using data from the southern United States , 2001 .

[16]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics , 2001 .

[17]  N. J. Jarvis,et al.  Quantifying the impact of preferential flow on solute transport to tile drains in a sandy field soil , 1999 .

[18]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Estimation of root water uptake parameters by inverse modeling with soil water content data , 2003 .

[19]  Yakov A. Pachepsky,et al.  Soil structure and pedotransfer functions , 2003 .

[20]  W. Bouten.  Soil water dynamics of the Solling spruce stand, calculated with the forhyd simulation package , 1995 .

[21]  J. Bouma,et al.  Functional Sensitivity Analysis of Four Methods to Generate Soil Hydraulic Functions , 1990 .

[22]  M. Turpault,et al.  Quantification of weathering processes in an acid brown soil developed from tuff (Beaujolais, France) , 1999 .

[23]  J. Wösten,et al.  Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils , 1999 .

[24]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Functional evaluation of pedotransfer functions derived from different scales of data collection , 2003 .

[25]  Marc Van Meirvenne,et al.  Evaluation of Pedotransfer Functions for Predicting the Soil Moisture Retention Curve , 2001 .

[26]  V. R. Tarnawski,et al.  Evaluation of Pedo-transfer Functions For Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic , 2001 .

[27]  F. Lelièvre,et al.  Drought survival in Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea under similar rooting conditions in tubes , 2001, Plant and Soil.

[28]  M. Schaap,et al.  ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions , 2001 .

[29]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media , 1993 .

[30]  Willem Bouten,et al.  A method for identifying optimum strategies of measuring soil water contents for calibrating a root water uptake model , 2000 .

[31]  Y. Mualem.  A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[32]  A. Papritz,et al.  A tracer experiment to study flow paths of water in a forest soil , 1999 .

[33]  Michael Battaglia,et al.  Modelling Site Productivity of Eucalyptus globulus in Response to Climatic and Site Factors , 1997 .

[34]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone , 2003 .

[35]  Bernd Diekkrüger,et al.  BIMODAL POROSITY AND UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 1991 .

[36]  J. Stricker,et al.  Functional behaviour of pedotransfer functions in soil water flow simulation , 2003 .

[37]  M. H. Broeke,et al.  Use of soil physical characteristics from laboratory measurements or standard series for modelling unsaturated water flow , 1996 .

[38]  G. Bourrié,et al.  Iron control by equilibria between hydroxy-Green Rusts and solutions in hydromorphic soils , 1999 .

[39]  D. Gelhaye,et al.  The dynamics of biomass and nutrient accumulation in a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) stand studied using a chronosequence approach , 1995 .

[40]  W. Payne,et al.  Measured and Modeled Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of a Walla Walla Silt Loam , 2001 .

[41]  K. Eckhardt,et al.  Plant parameter values for models in temperate climates , 2003 .

[42]  F. Gérard,et al.  Silicate weathering mechanisms determined using soil solutions held at high matric potential , 2003 .

[43]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Modelling soil water dynamics in a forested ecosystem. III: Model description and evaluation of discretization , 1992 .

[44]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Improved Prediction of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity with the Mualem‐van Genuchten Model , 2000 .

[45]  A. Granier,et al.  A lumped water balance model to evaluate duration and intensity of drought constraints in forest stands , 1999 .