A study on inter-city cooperation in the Yangtze river delta region, China

Abstract Inter-city cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta region is a new phenomenon and has received much governmental and scholarly attention in recent years. This paper examines inter-city cooperation from partnership perspective. In this study, three typical cases of inter-city cooperation, Suzhou–Wuxi–Changzhou City-region Planning, the Forum for the Coordination of Urban Economy of Yangtze River Delta Region and Jiangyin Economic Development Zone in Jingjiang are selected to examine three types of partnership arrangements, namely, hierarchical partnership, spontaneous partnership and hybrid partnership. This research applies the partnership approach to regional scale based on Chinese experiences. The research focus of this paper is the effectiveness of three types of inter-city cooperation. Through tracing the process of partnership formation and investigating stakeholder interactions, this paper argues that the effectiveness of inter-city cooperation depends on cooperation mechanism, the nature and scope of the cooperation, and partner selection and the roles of actors in partnership formation.

[1]  A. Church,et al.  Urban Power, International Networks and Competition: The Example of Cross-border Cooperation , 1996 .

[2]  N. Bailey,et al.  Partnership Agencies In British Urban Policy , 1995 .

[3]  W. Riker,et al.  An Introduction To Positive Political Theory , 1973 .

[4]  J. Logan,et al.  Market Transition and the Commodification of Housing in Urban China , 1996 .

[5]  Fulong Wu,et al.  China's changing economic governance: Administrative annexation and the reorganization of local governments in the Yangtze River Delta , 2006 .

[6]  Jianfa Shen.  Scale, state and the city: Urban transformation in post-reform China , 2007 .

[7]  María Teresa Vázquez-Castillo.  Mexico‐US Bilateral Planning: Institutions, Planners and Communities , 2001 .

[8]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[9]  Fulong Wu,et al.  China's Changing Urban Governance in the Transition Towards a More Market-oriented Economy , 2002 .

[10]  Andrew E. G. Jonas,et al.  The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives, Two Decades Later , 1999 .

[11]  Y. Wei,et al.  Reforms, Globalization, and Urban Growth in China: The Case of Hangzhou , 2002 .

[12]  B. Klagge,et al.  Metropolitan cooperation in Europe: Theoretical issues and perspectives for urban networking 1 , 2003 .

[13]  Laurence J. C. Ma,et al.  Urbanisation from Below: The Growth of Towns in Jiangsu, China , 1994 .

[14]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[15]  Anthony Gar-On Yeh,et al.  The Transformation of the Urban Planning System in China from a Centrally-Planned to Transitional Economy , 1999 .

[16]  B. Jessop.  The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development , 1998 .

[17]  John S. Klemanski,et al.  Power and City Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Urban Development , 1999 .

[18]  H. Molotch.  The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Zhiqiang Feng,et al.  State-Sponsored and Spontaneous Urbanization in the Pearl River Delta of South China, 1980-1998 , 2002 .

[20]  I. Elander.  Partnerships and urban governance , 2002 .

[21]  Dennis Chong.  Collective action and the civil rights movement , 1991 .

[22]  Petra Jahnke,et al.  Regional Policy through Co-operation: From Urban Forum to Urban Network , 2000 .

[23]  Clarence N. Stone.  URBAN REGIMES AND THE CAPACITY TO GOVERN: A Political Economy Approach , 1993 .

[24]  J. Feagin,et al.  Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. , 1990 .