Virtual Reality Simulator versus Conventional Advanced Life Support Training for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Post-Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

External chest compressions are often ineffective for patients arresting after cardiac surgery, for whom emergency resternotomy may be required. A single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed, with participants being randomized to a virtual reality (VR) Cardiac Surgical Unit Advanced Life Support (CSU-ALS) simulator training arm or a conventional classroom CSU-ALS training arm. Twenty-eight cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) residents were included and subsequently assessed in a moulage scenario in groups of two, either participating as a leader or surgeon. The primary binary outcomes were two time targets: (1) delivering three stacked shocks within 1 min and (2) resternotomy within 5 min. Secondary outcomes were the number of protocol mistakes made and a questionnaire after the VR simulator. The conventional training group administered stacked shocks within 1 min in 43% (n = 6) of cases, and none in the VR group reached this target, missing it by an average of 25 s. The resternotomy time target was reached in 100% of the cases (n = 14) in the conventional training group and in 83% of the cases (n = 10) in the VR group. The VR group made 11 mistakes in total versus 15 for those who underwent conventional training. Participants reported that the VR simulator was useful and easy to use. The results show that the VR simulator can provide adequate CSU-ALS training. Moreover, VR training results in fewer mistakes suggesting that repetitive practice in an immersive environment improves skills.

[1]  A. Bogers,et al.  Virtual Reality Simulation Training for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Cardiac Surgery: Face and Content Validity Study , 2022, JMIR serious games.

[2]  J. Soar,et al.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. , 2021, Resuscitation.

[3]  K. Monsieurs,et al.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation. , 2021, Resuscitation.

[4]  Robert-Jan van Geuns,et al.  Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, JAMA cardiology.

[5]  Aaron M. Cheng,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus for the Resuscitation of Patients Who Arrest After Cardiac Surgery. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  J. Bender,et al.  Does simulation booster impact retention of resuscitation procedural skills and teamwork? , 2014, Journal of Perinatology.

[7]  J. Soar,et al.  A systematic review of retention of adult advanced life support knowledge and skills in healthcare providers. , 2012, Resuscitation.

[8]  M. Motamedi,et al.  CPR Training for Nurses: How often Is It Necessary? , 2012, Iranian Red Crescent medical journal.

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010 .

[10]  D. Moher,et al.  CorrespondenceCONSORT 2010 Statement : updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010 .

[11]  P. Kolh,et al.  Guideline for resuscitation in cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. , 2009, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  M. Mäkelä,et al.  Methods of assessing cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills: a systematic review , 2007, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[13]  J. Dunning,et al.  The Cardiac Surgery Advanced Life Support Course (CALS): delivering significant improvements in emergency cardiothoracic care. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.