Efficiency Evaluation in Secondary Schools: The Key Role of Model Specification and of "Ex Post" Analysis of Results.

This paper evaluates the efficiency of a sample of Spanish secondary schools, paying particular attention to the theoretical specification of the measurement model and to the ex post analysis of the results, aspects which, despite being of undoubted importance, have nevertheless received little attention in the previous literature on the subject. The paper tries to demonstrate that, in order for a study of this nature to have the minimum solvency, it is the special characteristics of the education production process that must form the basic guidelines to be followed by the researcher. The paper also highlights the characteristics that differentiate the most efficient schools from the least efficient, and emphasises the importance of completing the information supplied by the quantitative methods of educational evaluation (such as data envelopment analysis), with data of a qualitative nature obtained by way of surveys directed at the pupils (customers) and the school decision-makers.

[1]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data , 1991 .

[2]  E. Cohn,et al.  Input-output analysis in public education , 1975 .

[3]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[4]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Stratified Models of Education Production Using Modified DEA and Regression Analysis , 1994 .

[5]  Peter Chalos,et al.  An application of data envelopment analysis to public sector performance measurement and accountability , 1995 .

[6]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[7]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring School District Performance , 1989 .

[8]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The measurement of productive efficiency : techniques and applications , 1993 .

[9]  J. Cubbin,et al.  Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1992 .

[10]  M. Blaug,et al.  Productivity Trends in British Secondary Education, 1950-63 , 1968 .

[11]  Marshall S. Smith,et al.  Effective Schools: A Review , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[12]  T. Donaldson,et al.  How Effective is Schooling , 1972 .

[13]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[15]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[17]  Michael Rutter,et al.  School Effects on Pupil Progress: Research Findings and Policy Implications. , 1983 .

[18]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models , 1995, Oper. Res. Lett..

[19]  David Mayston,et al.  Developing Models of Educational Accountability , 1988 .

[20]  Peter C Smith,et al.  Measuring efficiency in the public sector , 1987 .

[21]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[22]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  A Reconceptualization of School Effects. , 1977 .

[23]  D. Reynolds.  The Search for Effective Schools , 1982 .

[24]  Michael Norman,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance , 1991 .

[25]  T. R. Nunamaker,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of non‐profit organizations: A critical evaluation , 1985 .

[26]  David Mayston,et al.  Performance Assessment in the Education Sector: educational and economic perspectives , 1987 .

[27]  J. Elam,et al.  Educational Productivity Council Employs Management Science Methods to Improve Educational Quality , 1984 .

[28]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[29]  G. Madaus,et al.  The Sensitivity of Measures of School Effectiveness , 1979 .

[30]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[31]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[32]  Jeff Kennington,et al.  An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District , 1982 .

[33]  Marlaine E. Lockheed,et al.  Improving Educational Efficiency in Developing Countries: what do we know?[1] , 1988 .

[34]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[35]  R. Murnane,et al.  Production and innovation when techniques are tacit: The case of education , 1984 .

[36]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Guiding Schools to Improved Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Illustration with Data from a Local Education Authority , 1994 .

[37]  E. Wailand Bessent,et al.  Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis , 1980 .

[38]  Byron W. Brown,et al.  The Production and Distribution of Cognitive Skills within Schools , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.