Corrosion is a major source of degradation in heritage metal objects, and any remedial measures are subject to a strong (Western) ethic that favors conservation as opposed to restoration. Accordingly, major scientific challenges exist for developing appropriate treatment methods to stabilize and protect artifacts after they are recovered from an archaeological site, both before and during their display or storage in a museum. Because inappropriate treatments can cause irreversible damage to irreplaceable objects, it is crucial that the chemical processes involved are fully understood and characterized before any preservation work is undertaken. In this regard, large infrastructural facilities such as synchrotrons, neutron sources, and particle accelerators provide a wealth of analytical possibilities, unavailable in smaller scale laboratories. In general, the intensity of the radiation available allows measurements on a short time scale or with high spatial resolution (or both), so heterogeneous changes induced by a chemical process can be recorded while they occur. The penetrative nature of the radiation (e.g., X-rays, protons, or neutrons) also allows a sample to be studied in air. If necessary, complete artifacts (such as paintings or statuettes) can be examined. In situ analysis in a controlled environment, such as a liquid or corrosive atmosphere, also becomes an exciting possibility. Finally, there are many complementary techniques (local atomic structure or crystal structure determination, macroscopic 3-D imaging (tomographies), imaging chemical analysis, and so on) so the many distinct details of a problem can be thoroughly explored. In this Account, we discuss the application of this general philosophy to studies of corrosion and its prevention in cultural heritage metals, focusing on our recent work on copper alloys. More specifically, we use synchrotron-based techniques to evaluate the use of corrosion potential measurements as a possible monitoring method for copper-based objects recovered from marine environments. The extraction of chlorides from such artifacts is a process that must take place before the artifacts are put on display or stored, because air exposure of untreated metal will result in severe damage or loss in as little as a few weeks. Chloride is removed by soaking the artifact for up to two years in tap water or dilute sodium sesquicarbonate, with regular solution changes. Our research supports the effectiveness of this treatment for thin nantokite (copper(I) chloride) layers, but it raises questions for copper hydroxychlorides (atacamite and paratacamite), especially when these minerals are trapped in fissures. Electrochemical parameters such as the corrosion potential are shown to be insensitive to the physical presence of large hydroxychloride coverages if they overlie a cuprite (Cu(2)O) layer. X-ray absorption spectroscopy proves to be a good monitor for the chloride in solution over the working electrode, whereas X-ray diffraction offers the potential for real-time measurement of the surface chloride composition. In principle, the two techniques together offer the possibility of monitoring surface and fluid levels simultaneously.
[1]
W. Oddy,et al.
THE STABILIZATION OF ‘ACTIVE’ BRONZE AND IRON ANTIQUITIES BY THE USE OF SODIUM SESQUICARBONATE
,
1970
.
[2]
C. Horie,et al.
Chalconatronite: a by-product of conservation?
,
1982
.
[3]
A. Moncrieff,et al.
The colouring, bronzing, and patination of metals
,
1982
.
[4]
Keith W. Jones,et al.
Use of synchrotron radiation in archaeometry
,
1986
.
[5]
I. MacLeod.
CONSERVATION OF CORRODED COPPER ALLOYS: A COMPARISON OF NEW AND TRADITIONAL METHODS FOR REMOVING CHLORIDE IONS
,
1987
.
[6]
P. A. Williams,et al.
Synthesis and stabilities of the basic copper(II) chlorides atacamite, paratacamite and botallackite
,
1989,
Mineralogical Magazine.
[7]
P. Williams,et al.
Mineralogical changes arising from the use of aqueous sodium carbonate solutions for the treatment of archaeological copper objects
,
1990
.
[8]
R. Lewis,et al.
THE RAPID HIGH RATE LARGE AREA X-RAY DETECTOR SYSTEM
,
1997
.
[9]
M. Adriaens,et al.
Ion Beam Study of Art and Archaeological Objects
,
2000
.
[10]
D. Scott.
Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Conservation
,
2002
.
[11]
Gareth Kear,et al.
Electrochemical corrosion of unalloyed copper in chloride media––a critical review
,
2004
.
[12]
Philippe Walter,et al.
Ion beam analysis of art works: 14 years of use in the Louvre
,
2004
.
[13]
A. Bell,et al.
Simultaneous in situ time resolved SR-XRD and corrosion potential analyses to monitor the corrosion on copper
,
2005
.
[14]
Eberhard Lehmann,et al.
Non-invasive studies of objects from cultural heritage
,
2005
.
[15]
Annemie Adriaens,et al.
Cell for simultaneous synchrotron radiation X-ray and electrochemical corrosion measurements on cultural heritage metals and other materials.
,
2006,
Analytical chemistry.
[16]
L. Bertrand,et al.
Novel interface for cultural heritage at SOLEIL
,
2006
.
[17]
Christian Degrigny,et al.
Evaluation of corrosion potential measurements as a means to monitor the storage and stabilization processes of archaeological copper-based artifacts.
,
2006,
Analytical chemistry.
[18]
M. Dowsett,et al.
Insights into electrolytic stabilization with weak polarization as treatment for archaeological copper objects
,
2007,
Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.
[19]
M. Dowsett,et al.
Optically detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements as a means of monitoring corrosion layers on copper.
,
2008,
Analytical chemistry.
[20]
M. Dowsett,et al.
Time resolved spectroelectrochemistry studies for protection of heritage metals
,
2008
.
[21]
M. Dowsett,et al.
An in-situ X-ray absorption spectroelectrochemistry study of the response of artificial chloride corrosion layers on copper to remedial treatment
,
2009
.