Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis.

[1]  M. Müllner,et al.  Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2004, JAMA.

[2]  S. Sumitsuji,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of the Prostar XL suture-mediated percutaneous vascular closure device following PCI: results of the Perclose AcceleRated Ambulation and DISchargE (PARADISE) Trial. , 2003, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[3]  B. Chevalier,et al.  Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high‐local‐risk patients: Results of a randomized multicenter trial , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  S. Sdringola,et al.  Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the era of closure devices , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  R. Kornowski,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial suturing device following percutaneous coronary interventions: a pilot evaluation. , 2002, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[6]  H. Brunner-La Rocca,et al.  Comparison of costs and safety of a suture‐mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  T. Craven,et al.  Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Z. M. Kahn,et al.  Safety and efficacy of the perclose suture–mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  G. Stone,et al.  Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  B. Horne,et al.  Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. , 2001, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[11]  J. Tanguay,et al.  Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: A single‐center experience , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  C. Moore,et al.  Complications of femoral artery closure devices , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  A. Coats,et al.  Femoral haemostasis after transcatheter therapeutic intervention: a prospective randomised study of the angio-seal device vs. the femostop device. , 2000, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  E. Topol,et al.  Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  H. Rickli,et al.  Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[16]  S. Yasuda,et al.  A Randomised Controlled Trial of Prostar PlusTMfor Haemostasis in Patients After Coronary Angioplasty , 2000 .

[17]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[18]  D. Baim,et al.  Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge. , 2000, American heart journal.

[20]  J. Eidt,et al.  Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[21]  S. Cronin,et al.  Achieving femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of methods. , 1999, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[22]  U. Gerckens,et al.  Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  J. Chamberlin,et al.  Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femostop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring Abciximab (ReoPro) , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[24]  F. Castriota,et al.  Femoral Arterial Hemostasis using the Angio-Sealª System after Coronary and Vascular Percutaneous Angioplasty and Stenting. , 1998, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[25]  S. Silber,et al.  Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[26]  C. Simpfendorfer,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of a Hemostatic Puncture Closure Device With Early Ambulation After Coronary Angiography fn1 , 1998 .

[27]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[28]  P. Probst,et al.  Use of a Collagen Plug Versus Manual Compression for Sealing Arterial Puncture Site After Cardiac Catheterization , 1997, Angiology.

[29]  M. Leon,et al.  Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Efficacy and safety of collagen implants for haemostasis of the vascular access site after coronary balloon angioplasty and coronary stent implantation , 1995 .

[31]  V. Flintoft,et al.  A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: what are the potential resource savings? , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[32]  B. Meier,et al.  Collagen application versus manual compression: a prospective randomized trial for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  J. Brinker,et al.  A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  W. Burger,et al.  Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[35]  E. Topol,et al.  Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[36]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.