Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis.
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Pocock | G. Stone | G. Dangas | J. Moses | M. Leon | R. Mehran | I. Moussa | M. Fahy | G. Mintz | E. Nikolsky | M. Negoita | A. Halkin | E. Aymong | Zoran Lasić | S. Krieger
[1] M. Müllner,et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2004, JAMA.
[2] S. Sumitsuji,et al. Clinical effectiveness of the Prostar XL suture-mediated percutaneous vascular closure device following PCI: results of the Perclose AcceleRated Ambulation and DISchargE (PARADISE) Trial. , 2003, The Journal of invasive cardiology.
[3] B. Chevalier,et al. Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high‐local‐risk patients: Results of a randomized multicenter trial , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[4] S. Sdringola,et al. Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the era of closure devices , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[5] R. Kornowski,et al. Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial suturing device following percutaneous coronary interventions: a pilot evaluation. , 2002, The Journal of invasive cardiology.
[6] H. Brunner-La Rocca,et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture‐mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[7] T. Craven,et al. Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] Z. M. Kahn,et al. Safety and efficacy of the perclose suture–mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[9] G. Stone,et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[10] B. Horne,et al. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. , 2001, The Journal of invasive cardiology.
[11] J. Tanguay,et al. Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: A single‐center experience , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[12] C. Moore,et al. Complications of femoral artery closure devices , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[13] A. Coats,et al. Femoral haemostasis after transcatheter therapeutic intervention: a prospective randomised study of the angio-seal device vs. the femostop device. , 2000, International journal of cardiology.
[14] E. Topol,et al. Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[15] H. Rickli,et al. Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.
[16] S. Yasuda,et al. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Prostar PlusTMfor Haemostasis in Patients After Coronary Angioplasty , 2000 .
[17] I. Olkin,et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .
[18] D. Baim,et al. Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[19] J. Spinelli,et al. Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge. , 2000, American heart journal.
[20] J. Eidt,et al. Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices. , 1999, American journal of surgery.
[21] S. Cronin,et al. Achieving femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of methods. , 1999, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
[22] U. Gerckens,et al. Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.
[23] J. Chamberlin,et al. Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femostop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring Abciximab (ReoPro) , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[24] F. Castriota,et al. Femoral Arterial Hemostasis using the Angio-Sealª System after Coronary and Vascular Percutaneous Angioplasty and Stenting. , 1998, The Journal of invasive cardiology.
[25] S. Silber,et al. Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[26] C. Simpfendorfer,et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Hemostatic Puncture Closure Device With Early Ambulation After Coronary Angiography fn1 , 1998 .
[27] S. Yusuf,et al. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 1998, The Lancet.
[28] P. Probst,et al. Use of a Collagen Plug Versus Manual Compression for Sealing Arterial Puncture Site After Cardiac Catheterization , 1997, Angiology.
[29] M. Leon,et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[30] A. Kastrati,et al. Efficacy and safety of collagen implants for haemostasis of the vascular access site after coronary balloon angioplasty and coronary stent implantation , 1995 .
[31] V. Flintoft,et al. A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: what are the potential resource savings? , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[32] B. Meier,et al. Collagen application versus manual compression: a prospective randomized trial for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[33] J. Brinker,et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[34] W. Burger,et al. Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[35] E. Topol,et al. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.
[36] N. Laird,et al. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.