Shake table tests of steel towers supporting extremely long-span electricity transmission lines under spatially correlated ground motions

Abstract Transmission lines from electricity transmission systems crossing wide rivers or canyons can have much longer spans (e.g. longer than 1000 m) compared with components from conventional civil structures. Steel towers supporting such extremely long-span transmission lines are unavoidably subjected to spatially correlated ground motions together with the coupling action between supporting towers and transmission lines. However, the influence of spatial variation of ground motions is not considered in current seismic design of the towers supporting extremely long-span transmission lines. This research was focused on an electricity transmission system crossing the 2nd longest river in China (which is also the 5th longest river in the world) to address the influence of spatial variation of ground motions on seismic response of the towers supporting extremely long-span transmission lines. A reduced-scale experimental model of the prototype was tested using shake tables. Spatially correlated ground motions generated taking into account the wave passage effect, the effect of coherency loss and the effect of local site conditions were used as inputs of the shake table tests. It was found that the spatially correlated ground motions can significantly amplify tower responses and such an effect should not be neglected in seismic analysis and design. Based on the test database, an empirical model was proposed to modify the acceleration response, member stress response and top displacement responses of the towers supporting extremely long-span transmission lines from uniform ground motions as conservative estimates of responses of the system under spatially correlated ground motions with the same magnitude.

[1]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[2]  H. Hao,et al.  Influence of ground motion spatial variation, site condition and SSI on the required separation distances of bridge structures to avoid seismic pounding , 2011 .

[3]  Nawawi Chouw,et al.  Required separation distance between decks and at abutments of a bridge crossing a canyon site to avoid seismic pounding , 2009 .

[4]  Nawawi Chouw,et al.  Experimental investigation of spatially varying effect of ground motions on bridge pounding , 2012 .

[5]  Dayong Li,et al.  Simulation of spatially correlated earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes , 2011 .

[6]  H. Hao.  Arch responses to correlated multiple excitations , 1993 .

[7]  Hong Hao,et al.  Spatial ground motion effect on relative displacement of adjacent building structures , 1999 .

[8]  H. Hao.  Ground-motion spatial variation effects on circular arch responses , 1994 .

[9]  L. Sedov.  Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics , 1960 .

[10]  Hong-Nan Li,et al.  Seismic Response of a Steel Trussed Arch Structure to Spatially Varying Earthquake Ground Motions Including Site Effect , 2010 .

[11]  Hong Hao,et al.  Multiple excitation effects on response of symmetric buildings , 1996 .

[12]  Shilin Dong,et al.  Seismic design for steel trussed arch to multi-support excitations , 2007 .

[13]  Hanlong Liu,et al.  An improved approximation for the spectral representation method in the simulation of spatially varying ground motions , 2012 .

[14]  H. Hao,et al.  Seismic response of multi‐span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion , 2002 .

[15]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable‐stayed bridges , 1992 .

[16]  Hong Hao,et al.  Numerical simulation of pounding damage to bridge structures under spatially varying ground motions , 2013 .

[17]  Bing Qu,et al.  Validation of Fault Rupture-Response Spectrum Analysis Method for Curved Bridges Crossing Strike-Slip Fault Rupture Zones , 2014 .

[18]  J. F. Hall,et al.  Arch dam response to nonuniform seismic input , 1990 .

[19]  Xin Li,et al.  A modified method for simulating non-stationary multi-point earthquake ground motion , 2010 .

[20]  J. Penzien,et al.  Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on smart-1 array data , 1989 .

[21]  Jihong Ye,et al.  Strength behavior and collapse of spatial-reticulated structures under multi-support excitation , 2011 .

[22]  Nawawi Chouw,et al.  Response of a Rc Bridge in WA to Simulated Spatially Varying Seismic Ground Motions , 2008 .

[23]  Li Tian,et al.  Influence of spatial variation of ground motions on dynamic responses of supporting towers of overhead electricity transmission systems: An experimental study , 2016 .