The role of trust and project commitment in new product development teams

Although trust has been an important focus of much research in the management literature due to its positive impact on performance, an examination of trust in the new product literature has been noticeably lacking. This study investigates the role of trust in new product development, particularly as it relates to project commitment and performance. Using data from both project leaders and team members from 41 NPD projects, the authors' tests whether trust has a direct or indirect effect on new product performance. The results indicate that project commitment mediates the relationship between trust and market performance but only through project commitment. No relationships are found between trust, commitment and project speed. The results of the study suggest that building trust in NPD project teams is crucial to generating commitment by team members to the project which, in turn, is important to new product performance. However, commitment contributes positively only to market performance and not project speed.

[1]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[2]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[3]  Flowing Past Organizational Walls , 1993 .

[4]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[5]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Speeding Up New Product Development: The Effects of Leadership Style and Source of Technology , 1991 .

[6]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior , 1998 .

[7]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  The Structure of Optimal Trust: Moral and Strategic Implications , 1999 .

[8]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The discipline of teams. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[9]  Jone L. Pearce,et al.  Person-based reward systems: A theory of organizational reward practices in reform-communist organizations , 1994 .

[10]  J. D. Sherman,et al.  Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time , 2000 .

[11]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[12]  H. W. Kee,et al.  Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion , 1970 .

[13]  P. Adler.  Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism , 2001 .

[14]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[15]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Winning the service game , 1995 .

[16]  J. Brockner,et al.  When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability , 1997 .

[17]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[18]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[19]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[20]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[21]  V. Mahajan,et al.  The Effect of Reward Structures on the Performance of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams , 2001 .

[22]  B. J. Zirger,et al.  The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time , 1996 .

[23]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp,et al.  The Effects of Trust and Interdependence on Relationship Commitment , 1996 .

[25]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads , 1989 .

[26]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Testing the "Side-Bet Theory" of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations , 1984 .

[27]  P. Schurr,et al.  Influences on exchange processes: Buyers' preconceptions of a seller's trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. , 1985 .

[28]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[29]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[30]  K. Dirks.  The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[32]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development , 1992 .

[33]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[34]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[35]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[36]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[37]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration in High‐Technology New Product Development Processes , 1998 .

[38]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The breakfast of champions: associations between champions and product development environments, practices and performance , 1998 .

[39]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[41]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships, Academy of Management Review, , . , 1998 .

[42]  Jerry Calton,et al.  Social Contracting as a Trust-Building Process of Network Governance , 1995, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[43]  A. Donnellon.  Crossfunctional Teams in Product Development: Accommodating the Structure to the Process , 1993 .

[44]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Product Leadership: Creating And Launching Superior New Products , 1998 .

[45]  K. Dirks.  Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[47]  W. Powell.  Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: New Form or Transitional Development? , 1987 .

[48]  L. G. Hrebiniak.  Effects of Job Level and Participation on Employee Attitudes and Perceptions of Influence , 1974 .

[49]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[50]  L. Hosmer.  TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .

[51]  H. Thamhain.  Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success , 1990 .

[52]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[53]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[54]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications , 1998 .

[55]  E. McDonough.  Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross-Functional Teams , 2000 .

[56]  W. L. Cron,et al.  Economic dependency on work: A moderator of the relationship between organizational commitment and performance. , 1995 .

[57]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  The Perpetual Enterprise Machine: Seven Keys to Corporate Renewal through Successful Product and Process Development , 1994 .

[58]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[59]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .