Influence of different contributions of scatter and attenuation on the threshold values in contrast-based algorithms for volume segmentation.

The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of different amount of attenuation and scatter on FDG-PET image volume segmentation using a contrast-oriented method based on the target-to-background (TB) ratio and target dimensions. A phantom study was designed employing 3 phantom sets, which provided a clinical range of attenuation and scatter conditions, equipped with 6 spheres of different volumes (0.5-26.5 ml). The phantoms were: (1) the Hoffman 3-dimensional brain phantom, (2) a modified International Electro technical Commission (IEC) phantom with an annular ring of water bags of 3 cm thickness fit over the IEC phantom, and (3) a modified IEC phantom with an annular ring of water bags of 9 cm. The phantoms cavities were filled with a solution of FDG at 5.4 kBq/ml activity concentration, and the spheres with activity concentration ratios of about 16, 8, and 4 times the background activity concentration. Images were acquired with a Biograph 16 HI-REZ PET/CT scanner. Thresholds (TS) were determined as a percentage of the maximum intensity in the cross section area of the spheres. To reduce statistical fluctuations a nominal maximum value is calculated as the mean from all voxel > 95%. To find the TS value that yielded an area A best matching the true value, the cross section were auto-contoured in the attenuation corrected slices varying TS in step of 1%, until the area so determined differed by less than 10 mm² versus its known physical value. Multiple regression methods were used to derive an adaptive thresholding algorithm and to test its dependence on different conditions of attenuation and scatter. The errors of scatter and attenuation correction increased with increasing amount of attenuation and scatter in the phantoms. Despite these increasing inaccuracies, PET threshold segmentation algorithms resulted not influenced by the different condition of attenuation and scatter. The test of the hypothesis of coincident regression lines for the three phantoms used provided no statistical basis for believing that the three lines are not coincident. Calibration curves needed to implement contouring algorithms based on adaptive TS segmentation of PET volumes can be devised in different conditions of attenuation and scatter. This opens the possibility of defining a unified contrast-based method for target delineation in different anatomical districts.

[1]  Tim Mulnix,et al.  PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Olivier Barret,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation and scatter correction of the GE Advance PET scanner with SimSET and Geant4 , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Lilli Geworski,et al.  Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  G Loi,et al.  Threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation in radiation treatment planning: the role of target-to-background ratio and target size. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  Roberta Matheoud,et al.  Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Biological imaging in radiation therapy: role of positron emission tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  W. Roa,et al.  Iterative threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  Di Yan,et al.  Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Anne Bol,et al.  A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Assessment of 18F PET signals for automatic target volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Andreas Bockisch,et al.  Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  D Visvikis,et al.  Fuzzy hidden Markov chains segmentation for volume determination and quantitation in PET. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: threshold contouring and lesion volumes. , 2006, Medical physics.

[16]  M. Rudoni,et al.  Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner. , 2007, Medical physics.

[17]  Valentino Bettinardi,et al.  Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Helmar Bergmann,et al.  An inter-laboratory comparison study of image quality of PET scanners using the NEMA NU 2-2001 procedure for assessment of image quality , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Andrea Schaefer,et al.  A contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer: derivation from phantom measurements and validation in patient data , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[21]  A. Riegel,et al.  Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[23]  Jean-François Daisne,et al.  Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. , 2004, Radiology.

[24]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[25]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Continuous-slice PENN-PET: a positron tomograph with volume imaging capability. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  D. Ball,et al.  Can a mathematical formula help define a radiation target volume using positron emission tomography? In regard to Black et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;60:1272-1282). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.