Relation between preoperative inspiratory lung resistance and the outcome of lung-volume-reduction surgery for emphysema.

BACKGROUND Surgery to reduce lung volume has recently been reintroduced to alleviate dyspnea and improve exercise tolerance in selected patients with emphysema. A reliable means of identifying patients who are likely to benefit from this surgery is needed. METHODS We measured lung resistance during inspiration, static recoil pressure at total lung capacity, static lung compliance, expiratory flow rates, and lung volumes in 29 patients with chronic obstructive lung disease before lung-volume-reduction surgery. The changes in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) six months after surgery were related to the preoperatively determined physiologic measures. A response to surgery was defined as an increase in the FEV1 of at least 0.2 liter and of at least 12 percent above base-line values. RESULTS Of the 29 patients, 23 had some improvement in FEV1 including 15 who met the criteria for a response to surgery. Among the variables considered, only preoperative lung resistance during inspiration predicted changes in expiratory flow rates after surgery. Inspiratory lung resistance correlated significantly and inversely with improvement in FEV1 after surgery (r=-0.63, P<0.001). A preoperative criterion of an inspiratory resistance of 10 cm of water per liter per second had a sensitivity of 88 percent (14 of 16 patients) and a specificity of 92 percent (12 of 13 patients) in identifying patients who were likely to have a response to surgery. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative lung resistance during inspiration appears to be a useful measure for selecting patients with emphysema for lung-volume-reduction surgery.

[1]  M. Decramer,et al.  Physiological basis of improvement after lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema: where are we? , 1999, The European respiratory journal.

[2]  David W. Kaczka,et al.  Relation Between Preoperative Inspiratory Lung Resistance and the Outcome of Lung-Volume-Reduction Surgery for Emphysema , 1999 .

[3]  G. Patterson,et al.  Outcome of Medicare patients with emphysema selected for, but denied, a lung volume reduction operation. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  A. Fein,et al.  Lung volume reduction surgery: answering the crucial questions. , 1998, Chest.

[5]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Effect of volume reduction on lung transplant timing and selection for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Perfusion scintigraphy in the evaluation for lung volume reduction surgery: correlation with clinical outcome. , 1997, Radiology.

[7]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Lung volume reduction surgery: comparison of preoperative radiologic features and clinical outcome. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  W. Richards,et al.  No-cut thoracoscopic lung plication: a new technique for lung volume reduction surgery. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  F. Sciurba.  Early and long-term functional outcomes following lung volume reduction surgery. , 1997, Clinics in chest medicine.

[10]  J. Wain,et al.  Preoperative predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in COPD patients undergoing bilateral lung volume reduction surgery. , 1997, Chest.

[11]  E. Russi,et al.  Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[12]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery for advanced emphysema. A comparison of median sternotomy and thoracoscopic approaches. , 1996, Chest.

[13]  M. Hauser,et al.  Bilateral volume reduction surgery for diffuse pulmonary emphysema by video-assisted thoracoscopy. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  F. Sciurba,et al.  Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. , 1996, Chest.

[15]  P. E. Walters,et al.  Lung volume reduction surgery. Case selection, operative technique, and clinical results. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[16]  R. Rogers,et al.  Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after lung-reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Yusen,et al.  Evaluation of patients with emphysema for lung volume reduction surgery. Washington University Emphysema Surgery Group. , 1996, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  J. Hankinson,et al.  American Thoracic Society. Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor). Recommendations for a standard technique--1995 update. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[19]  J. Cooper,et al.  Bilateral pneumectomy (volume reduction) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  J. Gurney,et al.  Regional distribution of emphysema: correlation of high-resolution CT with pulmonary function tests in unselected smokers. , 1992, Radiology.

[21]  Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society. , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[22]  K P Van de Woestijne,et al.  Mechanical properties of lungs and chest wall during spontaneous breathing. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[23]  R. Ingram,et al.  Nonhomogeneous alveolar pressure swings in the presence of airway closure. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[24]  G Grimby,et al.  Frequency dependence of flow resistance in patients with obstructive lung disease. , 1968, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[25]  E SALAZAR,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF PRESSURE-VOLUME CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LUNGS. , 1964, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  O. Brantigan,et al.  A surgical approach to pulmonary emphysema. , 1959, The American review of respiratory disease.

[27]  J. Mead,et al.  The mechanical properties of the lungs in emphysema. , 1955, The Journal of clinical investigation.