Science Education in Primary Schools: Is an Animation Worth a Thousand Pictures?

Science teaching deals with abstract concepts and processes that very often cannot be seen or touched. The development of Java, Flash, and other web-based applications allow teachers and educators to present complex animations that attractively illustrate scientific phenomena. Our study evaluated the integration of web-based animated movies into primary schools science curriculum. Our goal was to examine teachers’ methods for integrating animated movies and their views about the role of animations in enhancing young students’ thinking skills. We also aimed at investigating the effect of animated movies on students’ learning outcomes. Applying qualitative and quantitative tools, we conducted informal discussions with science teachers (N = 15) and administered pre- and post-questionnaires to 4th (N = 641) and 5th (N = 694) grade students who were divided into control and experimental groups. The experimental group students studied science while using animated movies and supplementary activities at least once a week. The control group students used only textbooks and still-pictures for learning science. Findings indicated that animated movies support the use of diverse teaching strategies and learning methods, and can promote various thinking skills among students. Findings also indicated that animations can enhance scientific curiosity, the acquisition of scientific language, and fostering scientific thinking. These encouraging results can be explained by the fact that the students made use of both visual-pictorial and auditory-verbal capabilities while exploring animated movies in diverse learning styles and teaching strategies.

[1]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[2]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[3]  Ramón Rubio García,et al.  Interactive multimedia animation with Macromedia Flash in Descriptive Geometry teaching , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Rethinking Methods in Psychology , 1995 .

[5]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[6]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  COMPUTERIZED MOLECULAR MODELING - THE NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCING MODEL PERCEPTION AMONG CHEMISTRY EDUCATORS AND LEARNERS , 2000 .

[7]  John J. Clement,et al.  Algorithms, Visualization, and Mental Models: High School Students' Interactions with a Relative Motion Simulation , 2000 .

[8]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[9]  R. Finke,et al.  Principles of mental imagery , 1989 .

[10]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis , 1995 .

[11]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  External and internal representations in the acquisition and use of knowledge: visualization effects on mental model construction , 2008 .

[12]  Miri Barak,et al.  Transforming an Introductory Programming Course: From Lectures to Active Learning via Wireless Laptops , 2007 .

[13]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning , 2005 .

[14]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Enhancing Undergraduate Students' Chemistry Understanding through Project-Based Learning in an IT Environment , 2005 .

[15]  Lawrence J. Najjar.  Principles of Educational Multimedia User Interface Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[16]  James P. Raffini.  Winners without losers: Structures and strategies for increasing student motivation to learn , 1993 .

[17]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  A Web-Based Chemistry Course as a Means To Foster Freshmen Learning , 2003 .

[18]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation in computer-based instruction , 1990 .

[19]  Haim Eshach,et al.  Should Science be Taught in Early Childhood? , 2005 .

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[21]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[22]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[23]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[24]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Haim Eshach,et al.  Science Literacy in Primary Schools and Pre-Schools , 2006 .

[26]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Question Posing, Inquiry, and Modeling Skills of Chemistry Students in the Case-Based Computerized Laboratory Environment , 2009 .

[27]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students' thinking and motivation , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .