Open Innovation and Stakeholder Engagement

The paradox of open innovation lies in the conflict between the practical desire to reap the benefits of open innovation and concern over the risk that others will misappropriate those benefits. Stakeholder theory and recent developments in value creation through stakeholder engagement can assist with reconciliation of this inherent structural risk. The limitations of existing open innovation typologies are identified, and a process-based model of open innovation is proposed. The model is then expanded to include stakeholder engagement. When integrated with stakeholder engagement, open innovation processes can be understood to generate benefits beyond the acquisition of specific information sought from external experts. The addition of stakeholder engagement to the open innovation model allows for greater understanding and easier acceptance of the risks inherent in the open innovation process.

[1]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[2]  Takis Katsoulakos,et al.  Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: a stakeholder‐oriented and integrative strategic management framework , 2007 .

[3]  M. Myers,et al.  Sharing Global Supply Chain Knowledge , 2008 .

[4]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[5]  P. Trott,et al.  WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES , 2009, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[6]  Communities of Practice for Open Innovation - Enabling Organizational Creativity? , 2010 .

[7]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[8]  Andrew Grantham,et al.  Unearthing key drivers of knowledge leakage , 2007 .

[9]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[10]  Diego Vazquez-Brust,et al.  The ‘win–win’ paradigm and stakeholder integration , 2009 .

[11]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[12]  R. Raeside,et al.  The Innovators’s Social Network , 2007 .

[13]  R. Rohrbeck Harnessing a Network of Experts for Competitive Advantage: Technology Scouting in the ICT Industry , 2010 .

[14]  Marianne W. Lewis Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[15]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[16]  M. Bogers The Open Innovation Paradox: Knowledge Sharing and Protection in R&D Collaborations , 2010 .

[17]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  The inter-organizational context of open innovation , 2006 .

[18]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[19]  Sanjay Sharma Through the lens of managerial interpretations: stakeholder engagement, organizational knowledge and innovation , 2005 .

[20]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[21]  C. Curado,et al.  Knowledge transfer and innovation in Brazilian multinational companies , 2011 .

[22]  Miguel A. Rodríguez,et al.  Using Stakeholder Dialogue as a Source for New Ideas - a Dynamic Capability Underlying Sustainable Innovation , 2006 .

[23]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[24]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks , 2011 .

[25]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The impact of aligning product development and technology licensing : a contingency perspective , 2011 .

[26]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[27]  W. Filho,et al.  Innovative Csr: From Risk Management to Value Creation , 2011 .

[28]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[29]  Thomas Maak,et al.  Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital , 2007 .

[30]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence , 2005 .

[31]  J. Kohnen,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant , 2006 .

[32]  R. Veliyath Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1996 .

[33]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[34]  Yves Fassin,et al.  Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation , 2008 .

[35]  Maria Bonnafous-Boucher,et al.  Stakeholder theory : a European perspective , 2005 .

[36]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[37]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[38]  Monika I. Winn,et al.  Building Chains and Directing Flows , 2008 .

[39]  D. Bell The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, a venture in Social Forecasting , 1974 .

[40]  Jörg Andriof,et al.  Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship , 2017 .

[41]  U. Lichtenthaler OpenInnovation:rentDebates,andFutureDirections , 2011 .

[42]  David M. Savino,et al.  The Role of Technology as an Enabler in Job Redesign , 2009 .

[43]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[44]  Petri Parvinen,et al.  Stakeholder management and path dependence in organizational transitions , 2008 .

[45]  Simon S. Gao,et al.  Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[46]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[47]  Ralph Eckardt,et al.  The Invisible Edge: Taking Your Strategy to the Next Level Using Intellectual Property , 2009 .

[48]  Jeff Frooman Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[49]  Vanessa Duarte,et al.  Separating the wheat from the chaff – a taxonomy of open innovation , 2011 .

[50]  A. Wicks,et al.  Managing for Stakeholders , 2008 .

[51]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms , 2004 .

[52]  N. Smith,et al.  The New Marketing Myopia , 2010 .

[53]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[54]  E. Huizingh Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[55]  E. Antonacopoulou,et al.  From Power to Knowledge Relationships: Stakeholder Interactions as Learning Partnerships , 2005 .

[56]  Geert Vissers,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Way of Knowledge Transfer? , 2007 .

[57]  W. Kim,et al.  How strategy shapes structure , 2010 .

[58]  Irina Savitskaya,et al.  Barriers to Open Innovation: Case China , 2010 .

[59]  Julia Roloff,et al.  Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management , 2008 .

[60]  R. Phillips,et al.  Stakeholder Engagement, Discourse Ethics and Strategic Management , 2010 .

[61]  Simone de Colle,et al.  Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art , 2010 .

[62]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms1 , 2011, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[63]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[64]  Anu Wadhwa,et al.  The Paradox of Being Open: External Technology Sourcing and Knowledge Protection , 2011 .

[65]  Sandra Waddock Integrity and Mindfulness : Foundations of corporate citizenship* , 2001 .

[66]  M. Greenwood Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility , 2007 .

[67]  M. Ozman Modularity, Industry Life Cycle and Open Innovation , 2011 .

[68]  Miguel A. Ariño,et al.  Does stakeholder engagement promote sustainable innovation orientation? , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[69]  Tobias Fredberg,et al.  Implications of Openness: A Study into (All) the Growing Literature on Open Innovation , 2010 .

[70]  A. Salter,et al.  My Precious. The Role of Appropriability Strategies in Shaping Innovative Performance , 2005 .

[71]  Joel West,et al.  The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities , 2008 .