The role and position of passive intervertebral motion assessment within clinical reasoning and decision-making in manual physical therapy: a qualitative interview study

Abstract Passive intervertebral motion (PIVM) assessment is a characterizing skill of manual physical therapists (MPTs) and is important for judgments about impairments in spinal joint function. It is unknown as to why and how MPTs use this mobility testing of spinal motion segments within their clinical reasoning and decision-making. This qualitative study aimed to explore and understand the role and position of PIVM assessment within the manual diagnostic process. Eight semistructured individual interviews with expert MPTs and three subsequent group interviews using manual physical therapy consultation platforms were conducted. Line-by-line coding was performed on the transcribed data, and final main themes were identified from subcategories. Three researchers were involved in the analysis process. Four themes emerged from the data: contextuality, consistency, impairment orientedness, and subjectivity. These themes were interrelated and linked to concepts of professionalism and clinical reasoning. MPTs used PIVM assessment within a multidimensional, biopsychosocial framework incorporating clinical data relating to mechanical dysfunction as well as to personal factors while applying various clinical reasoning strategies. Interpretation of PIVM assessment and subsequent decisions on manipulative treatment were strongly rooted within practitioners' practical knowledge. This study has identified the specific role and position of PIVM assessment as related to other clinical findings within clinical reasoning and decision-making in manual physical therapy in The Netherlands. We recommend future research in manual diagnostics to account for the multivariable character of physical examination of the spine.

[1]  C. Liebenson,et al.  Motion palpation: it's time to accept the evidence. , 1999, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[2]  Mikel Aickin,et al.  Efficacy of Cervical Endplay Assessment as an Indicator for Spinal Manipulation , 2003, Spine.

[3]  Kathryn M. Refshauge,et al.  Clinical reasoning in physiotherapy , 2004 .

[4]  E. Colucci.  “Focus Groups Can Be Fun”: The Use of Activity-Oriented Questions in Focus Group Discussions , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[5]  Brendan McCane,et al.  Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment , 2005, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[6]  John D. Childs,et al.  Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Paul Glasziou,et al.  Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  M. Simmonds,et al.  Therapists' conceptualization and characterization of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[9]  D. Ramaekers,et al.  The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  J. Fritz,et al.  Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity. , 2009, Manual therapy.

[11]  Megan Smith,et al.  Clinical reasoning in physiotherapy , 2008 .

[12]  Kiyokazu Akasaka,et al.  Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test. , 2008, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[13]  C. Littlewood,et al.  Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. , 2006, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[14]  P. Huijbregts,et al.  Spinal Motion Palpation: A Review of Reliability Studies , 2002 .

[15]  L. Resnik,et al.  Using clinical outcomes to explore the theory of expert practice in physical therapy. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[16]  Sanjay Sharma.  LEVELS OF EVIDENCE , 2007 .

[17]  William Duquet,et al.  The clinical examination of neck pain patients: the validity of a group of tests. , 2007, Manual therapy.

[18]  A. Titchen,et al.  The nature of professional craft knowledge , 2001 .

[19]  C. Leboeuf‐Yde,et al.  Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review. , 2000, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[20]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[21]  G. Jull,et al.  Manual examination: is pain provocation a major cue for spinal dysfunction? , 1994, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy.

[22]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review. , 2005, Manual therapy.

[23]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professionalism: The Third Logic , 2001 .

[24]  F. Wolf,et al.  Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning , 2003, Medical teacher.

[25]  A. Blackmore,et al.  The diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test in C1/2-related cervicogenic headache. , 2007, Manual therapy.

[26]  Ian Edwards,et al.  Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. , 2004, Physical therapy.

[27]  S. May,et al.  Expert therapists use specific clinical reasoning processes in the assessment and management of patients with shoulder pain: a qualitative study. , 2008, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[28]  Patrick M M Bossuyt,et al.  Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design to Guide Test Evaluation , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[29]  C. Doody,et al.  Clinical Reasoning of Expert and Novice Physiotherapists in an Outpatient Orthopaedic Setting , 2002 .

[30]  Joy Higgs,et al.  Practice Knowledge and Expertise in the Health Professions , 2001 .

[31]  Michael T. Haneline,et al.  Spinal motion palpation: a comparison of studies that assessed intersegmental end feel vs excursion. , 2008, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[32]  L. Christman.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1977 .

[33]  C. Maher,et al.  Does the choice of spinal level treated during posteroanterior (PA) mobilisation affect treatment outcome? , 2002 .

[34]  L. Hale,et al.  Clinical Reasoning in Musculoskeletal Practice: Students’ Conceptualizations , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[35]  J. Bowen.  Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  W. Vach,et al.  Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility. , 2006, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[37]  J. Pool,et al.  Physical Therapy and Manual Physical Therapy: Differences in Patient Characteristics , 2005 .

[38]  B. K. Humphreys,et al.  An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a 'gold standard' , 2004, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[39]  C. A. King,et al.  Expertise in diagnostic reasoning: a comparative study , 1998 .

[40]  D. Rivett,et al.  Hypothesis Generation in the Clinical Reasoning Behavior of Manual Therapists , 1997 .

[41]  G. Jull,et al.  Inter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper cervical joint dysfunction. , 1997, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[42]  Patrick M M Bossuyt,et al.  Perceptions and use of passive intervertebral motion assessment of the spine: a survey among physiotherapists specializing in manual therapy. , 2009, Manual therapy.

[43]  K. Shepard,et al.  Attribute dimensions that distinguish master and novice physical therapy clinicians in orthopedic settings. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[44]  K. Shepard,et al.  Expert practice in physical therapy. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[45]  Judith Green,et al.  Qualitative methods for health research , 2004 .

[46]  J. Farrell,et al.  Manual therapy: a critical assessment of role in the profession of physical therapy. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[47]  Diederick E Grobbee,et al.  Test research versus diagnostic research. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[48]  L. Murphy,et al.  Reliability of Spinal Palpation for Diagnosis of Back and Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2004, Spine.

[49]  John D. Childs,et al.  Accuracy of the clinical examination to predict radiographic instability of the lumbar spine , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[50]  C. Cook,et al.  Eight critical skill sets required for manual therapy competency: a Delphi study and factor analysis of physical therapy educators of manual therapy. , 2007, Journal of allied health.

[51]  E. Pettman.  A History of Manipulative Therapy , 2007, The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy.

[52]  C. Maher,et al.  Pain or resistance - the manual therapists' dilemma. , 1992, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[53]  O. Payton.  Clinical reasoning process in physical therapy. , 1985, Physical therapy.