Spectral Screened Orthogonal Subspace Projection for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery

We introduce several new approaches in increasing spectral screening accuracy and reliability and study their applicability for orthogonal subspace projection-based target detection. Spectral screening is a technique used for selecting a representative subset of spectra from hyperspectral data. The subset is formed such that any two spectra in it are dissimilar, and for any spectrum in the original image cube, there is a similar spectrum in the subset. Spectral screening is performed in a sequential manner; at each step, the subset is increased with a spectrum dissimilar from all the spectra already selected. The procedure, using the spectral angle as similarity measure, is employed in a variety of algorithms for linear unmixing and data compression. We modified this algorithm such that at the selection step the spectrum with the largest distance from the set is selected. While not introducing additional computational complexity, the maximum spectral screening (Max SS) algorithm ensures that the overlap among the representatives is minimized, and that the solution is deterministically obtained, eliminating the need for multiple experiments. We also investigated the alternative approach in which at each step the spectrum with the smallest distance (but larger than a threshold value) is selected. In a distinct direction, we also studied the efficiency of the two algorithms by designing detection filters obtained as the classification projector matrices based on the spectral subset using regular or kernel-based orthogonal subspace projections (KOSP and OSP, respectively). The developed algorithms were tested on Hyperspectral Digital Collection Experiment (HYDICE) hyper-spectral data using the spectral angle and the spectral information divergence. The results indicated that Max SS outperforms regular spectral screening detection and minimum spectral screening (Min SS).

[1]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  An experiment-based quantitative and comparative analysis of target detection and image classification algorithms for hyperspectral imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  David Gillis,et al.  New results from the ORASIS/NEMO compression algorithm , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[3]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel orthogonal subspace projection for hyperspectral signal classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  An information-theoretic approach to spectral variability, similarity, and discrimination for hyperspectral image analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Automatic spectral target recognition in hyperspectral imagery , 2003 .

[6]  David P. Bannon Information Across the Spectrum , 2004 .

[7]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel matched subspace detectors for hyperspectral target detection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A quantitative and comparative analysis of endmember extraction algorithms from hyperspectral data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  M. Stefanou,et al.  A Signal Processing Perspective of Hyperspectral Imagery Analysis Techniques , 1997 .

[10]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  J. Boardman,et al.  Discrimination among semi-arid landscape endmembers using the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) algorithm , 1992 .

[12]  Tiranee Achalakul,et al.  Real‐time multi‐spectral image fusion , 2001, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[13]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[14]  Stefan A. Robila,et al.  Using spectral distances for speedup in hyperspectral image processing , 2005 .

[15]  Tiranee Achalakul,et al.  A distributed spectral-screening PCT algorithm , 2003, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[16]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[17]  N. Keshava,et al.  Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  D. Roberts,et al.  A comparison of error metrics and constraints for multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis and spectral angle mapper , 2004 .

[19]  Chein-I. Chang,et al.  New Hyperspectral Discrimination Measure for Spectral Characterization , 2004 .

[20]  A. Gershman,et al.  Spectral matching accuracy in processing hyperspectral data , 2005, International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2005. ISSCS 2005..

[21]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A generalized orthogonal subspace projection approach to unsupervised multispectral image classification , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Stefan A. Robila,et al.  Investigation of spectral screening techniques for independent-component-analysis-based hyperspectral image processing , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[23]  Ronald G. Resmini,et al.  Target detection in a forest environment using spectral imagery , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[24]  P. Wintz,et al.  Information Extraction, SNR Improvement, and Data Compression in Multispectral Imagery , 1973, IEEE Trans. Commun..