Matrix representation of stability definitions for the graph model for conflict resolution with reciprocal preference relations

Abstract Within the framework of the graph model, a matrix formulation is developed to model and analyze conflicts in which decision makers (DMs) may have reciprocal preferences. Specifically, matrix expressions are employed to represent DMs' reciprocal preference relations, unilateral movements (UMs) and fuzzy unilateral improvements (FUIs), as well as joint UMs and joint FUIs for a coalition of two or more DMs. Furthermore, a matrix methodology is provided to calculate whether a state in a conflict model, or scenario, is stable for a particular DM under various solution concepts, or stability definitions, that reflect the diversity of possible behavioral patterns for a DM in a conflict when preferences can be reciprocal. Five solution concepts associated with reciprocal preferences, Fuzzy Nash Stability, Fuzzy Symmetric Metarationality, Fuzzy General Metarationality, Fuzzy Sequential Stability, and Fuzzy Symmetric Sequential Stability, are redefined for matrix representations of both two-DM and multiple-DM conflict models. To illustrate how the matrix representation can be conveniently employed in practice, it is applied to two real-world conflicts.

[1]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 2004 .

[2]  Haiyan Xu,et al.  Combining strength and uncertainty for preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers , 2010 .

[3]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[4]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Coalition Analysis in Group Decision Support , 2001 .

[5]  Louis Aimé Fono,et al.  Choice Functions Generated by Mallows and Plackett-Luce Relations , 2019, New Math. Nat. Comput..

[6]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Communication features in a DSS for conflict resolution based on the graph model , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[7]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy preferences in multiple participant decision making , 2011, Sci. Iran..

[8]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Integrating Uncertain Preferences into Status Quo Analysis with Applications to an Environmental Conflict , 2005 .

[9]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Algorithms to Detect and Rectify Multiplicative and Ordinal Inconsistencies of Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[10]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Matrix Representation of Solution Concepts in Multiple-Decision-Maker Graph Models , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[11]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  An integrated algebraic approach to conflict resolution with three-level preference , 2010, Appl. Math. Comput..

[12]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A decision support system for interactive decision making - Part II: analysis and output interpretation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[13]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy Preferences in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[14]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A general hierarchical graph model for conflict resolution with application to greenhouse gas emission disputes between USA and China , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Visualizing and rectifying different inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 2019, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[17]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Generalized metarationalities in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2006, Discret. Appl. Math..

[18]  Luis G. Vargas Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions: Niall M. FRASER and Keith W. HIPEL Volume 11 in: North-Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, North-Holland, New York, 1984, xx + 377 pages, $34.50 , 1985 .

[19]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Metagame analysis of the Garrison Conflict , 1980 .

[20]  John Peng A decision support system for conflict resolution , 1999 .

[21]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Cyclic Evaluation of Transitivity of Reciprocal Relations , 2006, Soc. Choice Welf..

[22]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[23]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Water allocation analysis of the Zhanghe River basin using the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with incomplete fuzzy preferences , 2019, Sustainability.

[24]  Leandro Chaves Rêgo,et al.  Symmetric Sequential Stability in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Multiple Decision Makers , 2017 .

[25]  Yejun Xu,et al.  A two-stage consensus reaching model for group decision making with reciprocal fuzzy preference relations , 2018, Soft Comput..

[26]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A decision support system for interactive decision making-Part I: model formulation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[27]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Conflict Resolution Using the Graph Model: Strategic Interactions in Competition and Cooperation , 2018 .

[28]  Bertrand Tchantcho,et al.  A core of voting games with improved foresight , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..

[29]  S. Brams,et al.  Nonmyopic Equilibria in 2×2 Games , 1981 .

[30]  Leandro C. Rego,et al.  Probabilistic Preferences in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[31]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Interval fuzzy preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2018, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[32]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A Matrix Representation of Attitudes in Conflicts , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[33]  K. Hipel,et al.  Conflict models in graph form: Solution concepts and their interrelationships , 1989 .

[34]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Strategic analysis of a brownfield revitalization conflict using the grey-based graph model for conflict resolution , 2015 .

[35]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[36]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution , 2014, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[37]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Niall M. Fraser Ordinal preference representations , 1994 .

[39]  K. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy preferences in conflicts , 2008 .

[40]  Leandro Chaves Rêgo,et al.  Upper and lower probabilistic preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[41]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Modeling Fuzzy and Interval Fuzzy Preferences Within a Graph Model Framework , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[42]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Grey-Based Preference in a Graph Model for Conflict Resolution With Multiple Decision Makers , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[43]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: Detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[44]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[45]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The graph model for conflicts , 1987, Autom..

[46]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2008, Syst. Eng..

[47]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A New Approach to Coalition Analysis Within the Graph Model , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[48]  S. Orlovsky Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation , 1978 .

[49]  Charles Leake Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1993 .

[50]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Solving Complex Conflicts , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[51]  K. Nakamura Preference relations on a set of fuzzy utilities as a basis for decision making , 1986 .

[52]  Haiyan Xu,et al.  Matrix Representation of Conflict Resolution in Multiple-Decision-Maker Graph Models with Preference Uncertainty , 2011 .

[53]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Matrix representation of conflicts with two decision-makers , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[54]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Non-Cooperative Games , 2000 .

[55]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy preferences in the sustainable development conflict , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[56]  Yejun Xu,et al.  The graph model for conflict resolution with incomplete fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 2019, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[57]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy preferences in a two-decision maker graph model , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[58]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Past, Present, and Future , 2005 .