COPHY: Counterfactual Learning of Physical Dynamics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Razvan Pascanu,et al. A simple neural network module for relational reasoning , 2017, NIPS.
[2] Ross B. Girshick,et al. Mask R-CNN , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[3] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Observational Data: Methods and Benchmarks , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[4] James R. Kubricht,et al. Intuitive Physics: Current Research and Controversies , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[5] Yann LeCun,et al. Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square error , 2015, ICLR.
[6] R. C. Oldfield. THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .
[7] Christopher D. Manning,et al. Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoning , 2018, ICLR.
[8] Jessica B. Hamrick,et al. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[9] M. McCloskey,et al. Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[10] Li Fei-Fei,et al. Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoning , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
[11] Alexandros G. Dimakis,et al. CausalGAN: Learning Causal Implicit Generative Models with Adversarial Training , 2017, ICLR.
[12] Pietro Liò,et al. Graph Attention Networks , 2017, ICLR.
[13] Max Welling,et al. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks , 2016, ICLR.
[14] Christian Wolf,et al. Object Level Visual Reasoning in Videos , 2018, ECCV.
[15] Judea Pearl,et al. Counterfactual Probabilities: Computational Methods, Bounds and Applications , 1994, UAI.
[16] Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al. Relational Neural Expectation Maximization: Unsupervised Discovery of Objects and their Interactions , 2018, ICLR.
[17] J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .
[18] Michael McCloskey,et al. Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects , 1983 .
[19] Emmanuel Dupoux,et al. IntPhys: A Framework and Benchmark for Visual Intuitive Physics Reasoning , 2018, ArXiv.
[20] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Building machines that learn and think like people , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[21] Jiajun Wu,et al. Galileo: Perceiving Physical Object Properties by Integrating a Physics Engine with Deep Learning , 2015, NIPS.
[22] Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo,et al. Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory , 2016, Nature.
[23] Aaron C. Courville,et al. FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer , 2017, AAAI.
[24] J. Tenenbaum,et al. CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoning , 2019, ICLR.
[25] J. Call,et al. Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks , 2008, Animal Cognition.
[26] Ross B. Girshick,et al. PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoning , 2019, NeurIPS.
[27] A. Caramazza,et al. Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.
[28] Abhinav Gupta,et al. Interpretable Intuitive Physics Model , 2018, ECCV.
[29] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. How, whether, why: Causal judgments as counterfactual contrasts , 2015, CogSci.
[30] Yuting Zhang,et al. Deep Visual Analogy-Making , 2015, NIPS.
[31] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. A Compositional Object-Based Approach to Learning Physical Dynamics , 2016, ICLR.
[32] Trevor Darrell,et al. Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answering , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
[33] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[34] Felix Hill,et al. Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networks , 2018, ICML.
[35] Razvan Pascanu,et al. Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physics , 2016, NIPS.
[36] Rob Fergus,et al. Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Example , 2016, ICML.
[37] Herbert Jaeger. Artificial intelligence: Deep neural reasoning , 2016, Nature.
[38] Niloy J. Mitra,et al. Unsupervised Intuitive Physics from Past Experiences , 2019, ArXiv.
[39] David Lopez-Paz,et al. Causal Discovery Using Proxy Variables , 2017, ICLR.
[40] Jiajun Wu,et al. Unsupervised Learning of Latent Physical Properties Using Perception-Prediction Networks , 2018, UAI.
[41] S. Levine,et al. Reasoning About Physical Interactions with Object-Centric Models , 2018 .
[42] Stefan Lee,et al. Embodied Question Answering in Photorealistic Environments With Point Cloud Perception , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[43] M. Oquab,et al. Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Tests for GAN Evaluation and Causal Discovery , 2016 .
[44] Peter Spirtes,et al. Introduction to Causal Inference , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[45] Jiajun Wu,et al. Learning to See Physics via Visual De-animation , 2017, NIPS.
[46] Chuang Gan,et al. The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes Words and Sentences from Natural Supervision , 2019, ICLR.
[47] Andrea Vedaldi,et al. ShapeStacks: Learning Vision-Based Physical Intuition for Generalised Object Stacking , 2018, ECCV.
[48] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. On causal and anticausal learning , 2012, ICML.
[49] Mélanie Frappier,et al. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect , 2018, Science.
[50] Judea Pearl,et al. Theoretical Impediments to Machine Learning With Seven Sparks from the Causal Revolution , 2018, WSDM.
[51] D. Ramanan,et al. CATER: A diagnostic dataset for Compositional Actions and TEmporal Reasoning , 2019, ICLR.
[52] M. McCloskey,et al. Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[53] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. Discovering Causal Signals in Images , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).