Deep Tissue Sequencing Using Hypodermoscopy and Augmented Intelligence to Analyze Atypical Pigmented Lesions

Background: Over the past decade, new technologies, devices, and methods have been developed to assist in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions. Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the performance of an augmented intelligence system in the assessment of atypical pigmented lesions. Methods: Nine atypical pigmented lesions on 8 patients were evaluated prior to surgical removal. No lesions had received previous treatment other than a diagnostic biopsy. Prior to surgical removal, each lesion was evaluated by an Augmented Intelligence Dermal Imager (AID) and the assessment parameters reviewed in light of the final histopathological diagnosis. Results: The AID was used to evaluate a limited set of atypical pigmented lesions and showed sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 61%, respectively, based on its internal risk assessment algorithms. Limitations: These cases represent early assessments of the AID in a clinical setting, all prior assessments having been carried out on digital images. The information received from these evaluations requires further validation and analysis to be able to extrapolate its clinical usefulness. Conclusion: The AID combines dermoscopy, hypodermoscopy, and a trained augmented algorithm to produce a diffusion map representing the features of each lesion compared to the learned characteristics from a database of known dermoscopy images of lesions with definitive prior diagnosis. The information gathered from the diffusion map might be used to calculate a malignancy risk factor for the lesion compared to known melanoma features. This malignancy risk factor could be helpful in providing information to justify the biopsy of an atypical pigmented lesion.

[1]  R. Webb,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[2]  M. Oliviero,et al.  Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  P. Carli,et al.  Dermoscopy and preoperative evaluation of melanoma thickness. , 2002, Clinics in dermatology.

[4]  E. Claridge,et al.  Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis: a new technique for imaging pigmented skin lesions , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Melanoma diagnosis by Raman spectroscopy and neural networks: structure alterations in proteins and lipids in intact cancer tissue. , 2004, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  Thilo Gambichler,et al.  Applications of optical coherence tomography in dermatology. , 2005, Journal of dermatological science.

[7]  M. Haniffa,et al.  The use of a spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis device in the real‐time diagnosis of melanoma in the setting of a melanoma screening clinic , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[8]  S. Menzies,et al.  Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta‐analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting , 2008, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  Salvador González,et al.  In vivo reflectance‐mode confocal microscopy in clinical dermatology and cosmetology , 2008, International journal of cosmetic science.

[10]  Matthew Thompson,et al.  Dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma: primary care diagnostic technology update. , 2011, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[12]  L. Ferris,et al.  New diagnostic aids for melanoma. , 2012, Dermatologic clinics.

[13]  D. Gutkowicz–Krusin,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic and management sensitivity to melanoma between dermatologists and MelaFind: a pilot study. , 2012, Archives of dermatology.

[14]  S. Seidenari,et al.  Negative pigment network identifies a peculiar melanoma subtype and represents a clue to melanoma diagnosis: a dermoscopic study of 401 melanomas. , 2013, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[15]  C. Lohse,et al.  Increasing incidence of melanoma among middle-aged adults: an epidemiologic study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. , 2014, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[16]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[17]  Giovanni Pellacani,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Dermoscopic Criteria Used to Differentiate Nevi From Melanoma: A Web-Based International Dermoscopy Society Study. , 2016, JAMA dermatology.

[18]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[19]  Toshiaki Saida,et al.  Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[20]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Dermoscopic characteristics of melanoma according to the criteria „ulceration“ and „mitotic rate“ of the AJCC 2009 staging system for melanoma , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  Deep Tissue Sequencing Using Augmented Intelligence to Probe Melanocytic Lesions , 2017, Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[22]  Alexander Wong,et al.  Discovery Radiomics via Deep Multi-Column Radiomic Sequencers for Skin Cancer Detection , 2017, ArXiv.

[23]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.