Design principle-based stimuli for improving creativity during ideation

The conceptualization of new designs involves several phenomena. Research indicates that new ideas are rarely, if ever, wholly novel ideas. Instead, new ideas are formed from combinations of existing ideas, supported by synthesis, transformation, analogy, morphing, and replacement. Moreover, while much research has explored the negative implications of fixation from examples and stimuli, there exists an emerging need to study potentially positive effects of inspirational cases. Many works have studied designers' exploratory practices of solution spaces revealing active discovery and investigation of similar solutions as analogies. These exploratory practices enable designers to better understand a problem and inspire new solutions. In this work, the authors demonstrate directed use of design principles as design inspiration to improve outputs of the ideation process. Specifically, this work focuses on design principles for the particular domain of additive manufacturing, but the results suggest avenues to generalize the process with design principles from different areas. In this study, the authors created a set of physical cards to communicate a derived set of design principles. Each card is comprised of three main elements: (i) a textual description of the principle, (ii) a simplified visual representation of the principle, and (iii) an example of a real world application of the principle. Participants (N = 61) were allotted two equally timed rounds to ideate solutions for a standard design problem and given a set of the design principle cards as an intervention between the first and second rounds. Idea quantity, quality, and novelty were measured per round. Results showed no significant change in quantity—an improvement over the established trend of a decline over consecutive sessions without stimulus. Significant improvements in quality and novelty, however, were measured, indicating that the cards did assist designers in ideation. The results demonstrate that the principles, formatted as discussed, provide real avenues to arrive at innovative solutions.

[1]  Darren A. Keese,et al.  Empirically-Derived Principles for Designing Products With Flexibility for Future Evolution , 2007 .

[2]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Boosting Creativity in Idea Generation Using Design Heuristics , 2015 .

[5]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The Role of Functionality in the Mental Representations of Engineering Students: Some Differences in the Early Stages of Expertise , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[7]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and abstracting as creative processes in the design of information systems , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[8]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[9]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[10]  Matthew I. Campbell,et al.  An experimental study on the effects of a computational design tool on concept generation , 2009 .

[11]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  The need for effective design guides in additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[12]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Design Principles: The Foundation of Design , 2015 .

[13]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  The Characteristics of Innovative, Mechanical Products , 2011 .

[14]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Bio-Inspired Design: An Overview Investigating Open Questions From the Broader Field of Design-by-Analogy , 2014 .

[15]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Design Thinking: New Product Development Essentials from the PDMA , 2015 .

[16]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[17]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes , 2015 .

[18]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  How do Design Heuristics Affects Outcomes , 2012 .

[19]  V. Goel Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[20]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Thinking with Sketches , 2009 .

[21]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  CROWDSOURCED DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR LEVERAGING THE CAPABILITIES OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING , 2015 .

[22]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  A Study of the Effectiveness of Empathic Experience Design as a Creativity Technique , 2011 .

[23]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Design Heuristics in Innovative Products , 2016 .

[24]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Analogies and metaphors in creative design , 2008 .

[25]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Innovations in Design Through Transformation: A Fundamental Study of Transformation Principles , 2009 .

[26]  John S. Gero,et al.  Effects of examples on the results of a design activity , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[27]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice , 2009, CHI.

[28]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Sketches for Design and Design of Sketches , 2003 .

[29]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing Sketch­based Interfaces for Modeling and Users' Needs: Redefining Connections Sketch-based Interfaces for Modeling and Users' Needs: Redefining Connections , 2022 .

[30]  Jinjuan She,et al.  Priming Designers to Communicate Sustainability , 2012 .

[31]  Mark Lorenz. Nowack Design guideline support for manufacturability. , 1997 .

[32]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Design-by-analogy and representation in innovative engineering concept generation , 2007 .

[33]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Principles for designing products with flexibility for future evolution , 2015 .

[34]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Design Innovation: A Study of Integrated Practice , 2017 .

[35]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  The Way Makers Prototype: Principles of DIY Design , 2015 .

[36]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Modality and representation in analogy , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.