Inertial Measures of Motion for Clinical Biomechanics: Comparative Assessment of Accuracy under Controlled Conditions - Effect of Velocity

Background Inertial measurement of motion with Attitude and Heading Reference Systems (AHRS) is emerging as an alternative to 3D motion capture systems in biomechanics. The objectives of this study are: 1) to describe the absolute and relative accuracy of multiple units of commercially available AHRS under various types of motion; and 2) to evaluate the effect of motion velocity on the accuracy of these measurements. Methods The criterion validity of accuracy was established under controlled conditions using an instrumented Gimbal table. AHRS modules were carefully attached to the center plate of the Gimbal table and put through experimental static and dynamic conditions. Static and absolute accuracy was assessed by comparing the AHRS orientation measurement to those obtained using an optical gold standard. Relative accuracy was assessed by measuring the variation in relative orientation between modules during trials. Findings Evaluated AHRS systems demonstrated good absolute static accuracy (mean error < 0.5o) and clinically acceptable absolute accuracy under condition of slow motions (mean error between 0.5o and 3.1o). In slow motions, relative accuracy varied from 2o to 7o depending on the type of AHRS and the type of rotation. Absolute and relative accuracy were significantly affected (p<0.05) by velocity during sustained motions. The extent of that effect varied across AHRS. Interpretation Absolute and relative accuracy of AHRS are affected by environmental magnetic perturbations and conditions of motions. Relative accuracy of AHRS is mostly affected by the ability of all modules to locate the same global reference coordinate system at all time. Conclusions Existing AHRS systems can be considered for use in clinical biomechanics under constrained conditions of use. While their individual capacity to track absolute motion is relatively consistent, the use of multiple AHRS modules to compute relative motion between rigid bodies needs to be optimized according to the conditions of operation.

[1]  Daniel Roetenberg,et al.  Inertial and magnetic sensing of human motion , 2006 .

[2]  Pietro Garofalo,et al.  First in vivo assessment of “Outwalk”: a novel protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  M A Brodie,et al.  The static accuracy and calibration of inertial measurement units for 3D orientation , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[4]  Daniele Giansanti,et al.  Inertial measurement units furnish accurate trunk trajectory reconstruction of the sit-to-stand manoeuvre in healthy subjects , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[5]  Michael Marschollek,et al.  Development and clinical validation of an unobtrusive ambulatory knee function monitoring system with inertial 9DoF sensors , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  Laura Rocchi,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  L. Rocchi,et al.  A simple test to assess the static and dynamic accuracy of an inertial sensors system for human movement analysis , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Salvatore Sessa,et al.  A Methodology for the Performance Evaluation of Inertial Measurement Units , 2013, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[10]  Adriano Ferrari,et al.  ‘Outwalk’: a protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[11]  M A Brodie,et al.  Dynamic accuracy of inertial measurement units during simple pendulum motion , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[12]  Marco Piras,et al.  Performances comparison of different MEMS-based IMUs , 2010, IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.

[13]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Human motion tracking for rehabilitation - A survey , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[14]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Magnetic distortion in motion labs, implications for validating inertial magnetic sensors. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[15]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  A spot check for assessing static orientation consistency of inertial and magnetic sensing units. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[16]  A Brennan,et al.  Quantification of inertial sensor-based 3D joint angle measurement accuracy using an instrumented gimbal. , 2011, Gait & posture.