The PUSH Tool: A Survey to Determine Its Perceived Usefulness

OBJECTIVE: To determine the perceived usefulness of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample identified through the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Web site as users or registered users of the PUSH tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A survey instrument was developed to capture experience, ease of use, and perceived utility and weakness of the PUSH tool. RESULTS: Of 103 respondents, most (79) agreed or strongly agreed that PUSH required an appropriate amount of time to complete. It was also found to be reliable and easy to use and teach to others. Respondents were not as positive regarding usefulness, with 75% indicating that increased PUSH scores prompt patient and treatment reassessment. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that improvement is possible in the size subscale (59%), the tissue type subscale (49%), and the exudate amount subscale (32%). Most commonly indicated for improvement was the addition of wound depth information. CONCLUSION: Respondents generally found PUSH easy to use and helpful in pressure ulcer management. Specific areas of improvement were also identified.

[1]  J. D. Shea Pressure sores: classification and management. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  B. Ferrell The Sessing Scale for measurement of pressure ulcer healing. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[3]  G T Rodeheaver,et al.  Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[4]  B. Bates-Jensen,et al.  The Pressure Sore Status Tool a few thousand assessments later. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[5]  R. Frantz,et al.  A prospective study of the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH). , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[6]  J. Cuddigan Pressure ulcer classification: what do we have? What do we need? , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[7]  M. Pompeo Implementing the push tool in clinical practice: revisions and results. , 2003, Ostomy/wound management.

[8]  G. Rodeheaver,et al.  An instrument to measure healing in pressure ulcers: development and validation of the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH). , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[9]  J. Maklebust PUSH Tool reality check: audience response. Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[10]  C Sussman,et al.  Utility of the Sussman Wound Healing Tool in predicting wound healing outcomes in physical therapy. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[11]  D. Krasner,et al.  Wound Healing Scale, version 1.0: a proposal. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.