Adaptive fuzzy k-NN classifier for EMG signal decomposition.

An adaptive fuzzy k-nearest neighbour classifier (AFNNC) for EMG signal decomposition is presented and evaluated. The developed classifier uses an adaptive assertion-based classification approach for setting a minimum classification threshold. The similarity criterion used for grouping motor unit potentials (MUPs) is based on a combination of MUP shapes and two modes of use of motor unit firing pattern information: passive and active. The performance of the developed classifier was evaluated using synthetic signals with specific properties and experimental signals and compared with the performance of an adaptive template matching classifier, the adaptive certainty classifier (ACC). Across the sets of simulated and experimental EMG signals used for comparison, the AFNNC had better average classification performance overall, but due to the assignment of higher numbers of MUPs it made relatively more errors. Nonetheless, these increased error rates would still be acceptable for most clinical uses of decomposed EMG data. An independent and a related set of simulated signals were used for testing. For the independent simulated signals of varying intensity, the AFNNC had on average an improved correct classification rate (CCr) (8.1%) but an increased error rate (Er) (1.5%) compared to ACC. For the related simulated signals with varying amounts of shape and/or firing pattern variability, the AFNNC on average had an improved CCr (5%) but a slightly increased Er (0.3%) compared to ACC. For experimental signals, the AFNNC on average had improved CCr (6%) but an increased Er (2.1%) compared to ACC. The greatest gains in AFNNC performance relative to that of the ACC occurred when the variability of MUP shapes within motor unit potential trains was high suggesting that compared to a template matching assignment strategy the NN assignment paradigm is better able to ameliorate the classification problems caused by MUP instability.

[1]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials - Part I: Technique, Theory, and Implementation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Automatic decomposition of selective needle-detected myoelectric signals , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Swarup Medasani,et al.  An overview of membership function generation techniques for pattern recognition , 1998, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  James M. Keller,et al.  A fuzzy K-nearest neighbor algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  M.H. Hassoun,et al.  NNERVE: Neural Network Extraction of Repetitive Vectors for Electromyography. II. Performance analysis , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Adaptive motor unit action potential clustering using shape and temporal information , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[7]  J. Basmajian Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .

[8]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  George S. Moschytz,et al.  A software package for the decomposition of long-term multichannel EMG signals using wavelet coefficients , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  D Stashuk,et al.  EMG signal decomposition: how can it be accomplished and used? , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[11]  Dr. D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  J. Fang,et al.  Decomposition of multiunit electromyographic signals , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Automatic Decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  P. Matthews Relationship of firing intervals of human motor units to the trajectory of post‐spike after‐hyperpolarization and synaptic noise. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  M.H. Hassoun,et al.  NNERVE: Neural Network Extraction of Repetitive Vectors for Electromyography. I. Algorithm , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  Physiology and Mathematics of Myoelectric Signals , 1979 .

[17]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[18]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust method for estimating motor unit firing-pattern statistics , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[19]  Shiro Usui,et al.  Digital Low-Pass Differentiation for Biological Signal Processing , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Multi‐motor unit action potential analysis (MMA) , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[22]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Daniel W. Stashuk,et al.  Physiologically based simulation of clinical EMG signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  E. Kaplan Muscles Alive. Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. J. V. Basmajian. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Co., 1962. $8.50 , 1962 .