Performance of Reinforced–Stabilized Unpaved Test Sections Built over Native Soft Soil under Full-Scale Moving Wheel Loads

This paper presents the findings from an ongoing research study that evaluated two recently developed geosynthetic products: a triaxial geogrid and a high-strength woven geotextile for reinforcing or stabilizing roads constructed over native soft soil in the state of Louisiana. Six full-scale test lane sections were constructed: two were reinforced by one and two layers of triaxial geogrids, respectively, while high-strength geotextile was used to reinforce two of the other sections with aggregate layers of different thicknesses. The remaining two sections were left as controls: one was constructed over a sand embankment 30 cm thick representing the common practice in southern Louisiana. The unpaved test sections were subjected to a full-scale moving wheel load applied by the accelerated loading facility. A variety of instrumentation was used to measure the load-associated and the environment-associated pavement responses and performance. Results of the full-scale testing on the unpaved test sections demonstrated the benefits of geosynthetic reinforcement–stabilization in reducing the permanent deformation in the pavement structure. The test sections’ resilient behavior did not seem to be influenced by the presence of geosynthetics. In addition, instead of the soft soil subgrade, the aggregate layer was the primary contributor to the total permanent deformation–surface rutting of the unpaved sections under the testing conditions in this study. Geosynthetics were mobilized and generally exhibited a strain around 0.2%.

[1]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Development of a mechanistic model for geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements , 2005 .

[2]  S W Perkins,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN METHODS FOR GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 2004 .

[3]  Murad Abu-Farsakh,et al.  Implementation of a Critical State Two-Surface Model to Evaluate the Response of Geosynthetic Reinforced Pavements , 2010 .

[4]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Construction and Instrumentation of Geosynthetically Stabilized Secondary Road Test Sections , 1996 .

[5]  S W Perkins.  EVALUATION OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SYSTEMS USING TWO PAVEMENT TEST FACILITIES , 2002 .

[6]  Jie Han,et al.  Numerical analysis of tensile behavior of geogrids with rectangular and triangular apertures , 2011 .

[7]  Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh,et al.  Effect of Reinforcement on Resilient and Permanent Deformations of Base Course Material , 2007 .

[8]  Mohammed A. Gabr,et al.  Numerical analysis of stress–deformation response in reinforced unpaved road sections , 2005 .

[9]  R. D. Barksdale,et al.  Potential benefits of geosynthetics in flexible pavement systems , 1989 .

[10]  Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh,et al.  Development of models to estimate the subgrade and subbase layers' resilient modulus from in situ devices test results for construction control. , 2008 .

[11]  Eli Cuelho,et al.  Relative Operational Performance of Geosynthetics Used as Subgrade Stabilization , 2014 .

[12]  S. W. Perkins,et al.  Mechanistic-Empirical Modeling of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Unpaved Roads , 2012 .

[13]  Xiaochao Tang.  A STUDY OF PERMANENT DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF GEOGRID-REINFORCED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS USING SMALL SCALE ACCELERATED PAVEMENT TESTING , 2010 .

[14]  Hani S. Mitri,et al.  3D FE Analysis of Flexible Pavement with Geosynthetic Reinforcement , 2006 .

[15]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  LABORATORY EVALUATION OF GEOSYNTHETIC-REINFORCED PAVEMENT SECTIONS , 1994 .

[16]  Ghassan R. Chehab,et al.  Evaluation of geogrids for stabilising weak pavement subgrade , 2008 .

[17]  J. C. Small,et al.  Effect of Geogrid Reinforcement in Model Track Tests on Pavements , 1996 .

[18]  Baoshan Huang,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Flexible Pavements , 1996 .

[19]  Steve L Webster,et al.  Geogrid Reinforced Base Courses for Flexible Pavements for Light Aircraft: Test Section Construction, Behavior Under Traffic, Laboratory Tests, and Design Criteria , 1993 .

[20]  J P Giroud,et al.  An assessment of the use of geogrids in unpaved roads and unpaved areas , 2009 .

[21]  Jiake Zhang,et al.  In-Ground Dynamic Stress Measurements for Geosynthetic Reinforced Subgrade/Subbase , 2011 .

[22]  Gregory J. Norwood,et al.  Full-Scale Evaluation of Geogrid-Reinforced Thin Flexible Pavements , 2012 .

[23]  Karen S. Henry,et al.  Structural Improvements of Flexible Pavements Using Geosynthetics for Base Course Reinforcement , 2009 .

[24]  R Haas.  STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF TENSAR REINFORCED PAVEMENTS AND SOME FIELD APPLICATIONS. POLYMER GRID REINFORCEMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF A CONFERENCE SPONSORED BY THE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING RESEARCH COUNCIL AND NETLON LTD AND HELD IN LONDON 22-23 MARCH 1984 , 1985 .

[25]  Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh,et al.  Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Performance of Geogrid-Reinforced Granular Base Material Using Repeated Load Triaxial Tests , 2011 .

[26]  Shelley M Stoffels,et al.  Resilient and Permanent Deformation Characteristics of Unbound Pavement Layers Modified by Geogrids , 2013 .

[27]  Jie Han,et al.  Performance of Triangular Aperture Geogrid-Reinforced Base Courses over Weak Subgrade under Cyclic Loading , 2013 .

[28]  Shelley M Stoffels,et al.  Reinforcement Tensile Behavior under Cyclic Moving Wheel Loads , 2013 .

[29]  Kevin Gaspard,et al.  Prediction of Resilient Modulus of Cohesive Subgrade Soils from Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test Parameters , 2007 .

[30]  Fereidoon Moghaddas-Nejad,et al.  RESILIENT AND PERMANENT CHARACTERISTICS OF REINFORCED GRANULAR MATERIALS BY REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL TESTS , 2003 .

[31]  Anand J. Puppala,et al.  Engineering Behavior of Lime-Treated Louisiana Subgrade Soil , 1996 .

[32]  Jeremy Pennard Love.  Model testing of geogrids in unpaved roads , 1984 .

[33]  R. Adams,et al.  Shoreline erosion in coastal Louisiana : inventory and assessment : final report to Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development , 1978 .