Rhetoric and reality of daily life in English care homes: the role of organised activities

In divergent ways, both government policy and care home practices influence the everyday life of older people living in English care homes. The rhetoric of choice for care home residents may be in conflict with the reality of government policy-driven service delivery. The aim of the article is to examine the role of organised activities in facilitating choice and active ageing among care home residents. Findings from a study of ten care homes in South East England exemplify the conflict between government policy rhetoric and the reality of care home life. The indication is that the formality of the ’’activities of daily living’’ support procedures restricts residents’ involvement in the organised social activities.Within the general provision of services, the organised ’’social activities’’ offered failed to meet the interest, cognitive and physical abilities of residents. The reality of ’’choice’’ is therefore questionable. Policy needs to support a transformation in the delivery of care to ensure it addresses the actual needs and expectations of older people experiencing care home life.

[1]  J Girvin,et al.  Education and training , 2016, Elderly care.

[2]  S. Arber,et al.  Time spent in bed at night by care-home residents: choice or compromise? , 2011, Ageing and Society.

[3]  Megs Okoye,et al.  Putting People First: a shared vision and commitment to the transformation of Adult Social Care , 2010 .

[4]  H. V. D. Meer,et al.  Older People , 2010 .

[5]  S. M. Suibhne.  Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates , 2009 .

[6]  B. Winblad,et al.  Pattern of participation in leisure activities among older people in relation to their health conditions and contextual factors: a survey in a Swedish urban area , 2009, Ageing and Society.

[7]  Evy Gunnarsson,et al.  ‘I think I have had a good life’: the everyday lives of older women and men from a lifecourse perspective , 2008, Ageing and Society.

[8]  Amanda Clarke,et al.  Hopes, fears and expectations about the future: what do older people's stories tell us about active ageing? , 2007, Ageing and Society.

[9]  K. Bryan,et al.  Professionalising the care of older people: Transforming the workforce , 2006 .

[10]  D. Venables,et al.  Quality in long-term care homes for people with dementia: an assessment of specialist provision , 2006, Ageing and Society.

[11]  A. Innes,et al.  Promoting Person-centred Care at the Front Line , 2006 .

[12]  A. While.  A new direction for community services? , 2006, British journal of community nursing.

[13]  H. Litwin,et al.  The association between activity and wellbeing in later life: what really matters? , 2006, Ageing and Society.

[14]  Bill Watson,et al.  The SEIQoL and functional status: how do they relate? , 2005, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[15]  Sandhi Maria Barreto,et al.  Global Ageing: The Demographic Revolution in All Cultures and Societies , 2005 .

[16]  K. Warner Schaie,et al.  Everyday Competence in Older Adults , 2005 .

[17]  P. Coleman,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing , 2005 .

[18]  Marti G. Parker,et al.  Are today's older people more active than their predecessors? Participation in leisure-time activities in Sweden in 1992 and 2002 , 2005, Ageing and Society.

[19]  S. Arber,et al.  Gender and Ageing , 2003 .

[20]  Gina Browne,et al.  Conceptualizations of frailty in relation to older adults. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[21]  R. Baldwin.  National Service Framework for Older People , 2003 .

[22]  C. Glendinning,et al.  Partnerships, performance and primary care: developing integrated services for older people in England , 2002, Ageing and Society.

[23]  Active Ageing: A Policy Framework , 2002 .

[24]  C. Ungerson.  Thinking about the Production and Consumption of Long-term Care in Britain: Does Gender Still Matter? , 2000, Journal of Social Policy.

[25]  Francis C. Biley,et al.  The effects on patient well-being of music listening as a nursing intervention: a review of the literature , 2000 .

[26]  J. Rowe,et al.  Successful aging. , 1998, Aging.

[27]  G. Lee-Treweek.  Women, Resistance and Care: An Ethnographic Study of Nursing Auxiliary Work , 1997 .

[28]  M. Lawton,et al.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. , 1969, The Gerontologist.

[29]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.

[30]  F. Post.  The Last Refuge. A Survey of Residential Institutions and Homes for the Aged in England and Wales , 1963, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[31]  Jerome Billeter,et al.  Putting people first: a shared vision and commitment to the transformation of adult social care , 2012 .

[32]  Kerry Allen.  Residential Care Transformed: Revisiting ‘The Last Refuge’ , 2011 .

[33]  Universitetet i Linköping.  International journal of ageing and later life : IJAL. , 2006 .

[34]  Peter Crome,et al.  The National Service Framework for Older People , 2004, Drugs & aging.

[35]  S. Arber,et al.  Re-examining gender and marital status: material well being and social involvement , 2003 .

[36]  T. Fulmer,et al.  Successful aging. , 2002, The American journal of nursing.

[37]  Nancy Roper,et al.  The Roper-Logan-Tierney model of nursing : based on activities of living , 2000 .

[38]  I. Eyers.  Education and Training. Do They "Really, Really" Want It? A Comparative Study of Care Home Staff in England and Germany. , 2000 .