Innovation embedded in entrepreneurs’ networks and national educational systems

The proposition that entrepreneurs’ innovation is embedded in networking is refined. We distinguish between networking in the public sphere and networking in the private sphere, and hypothesize that innovation benefits from public sphere networking but suffers from private sphere networking. These hypotheses are tested with a representative sample of 56,611 entrepreneurs in 61 countries surveyed in the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Hierarchical linear modeling shows that, while overall networking benefits innovation, innovation is decreased by private sphere networking and increased by networking in the public sphere, especially in the professions and internationally. A further refinement is to consider entrepreneurs’ endeavors as embedded in society with its system of education for entrepreneurship. We hypothesize that the quality of a national system moderates the impacts of networks on innovation by adding value to networks. Analyses show that quality of national educational system adds innovation benefits to both public sphere networking and private sphere networking.

[1]  Gert Jan Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. , 2010 .

[2]  Scott Shane,et al.  Cultural influences on national rates of innovation , 1993 .

[3]  A. Greve,et al.  Social Networks and Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[4]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[5]  Rögnvaldur J. Saemundsson,et al.  Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Special Report : A Global Perspective on Entrepreneurship Education and Training , 2010 .

[6]  L. E. Pate,et al.  Getting wired for innovation , 2006 .

[7]  E. Autio,et al.  Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998–2003 , 2005 .

[8]  R. Merton.  Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England , 1938, Osiris.

[9]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[10]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[11]  Erkko Autio,et al.  Global entrepreneurship and institutions: an introduction , 2014 .

[12]  Size, Diversity and Components in the Network Around an Entrepreneur: Shaped by Culture and Shaping Embeddedness of Firm Relations , 2014 .

[13]  Z. Ács,et al.  Intellectual Property Protection and the Formation of Entrepreneurial Growth Aspirations , 2010 .

[14]  J. Vang,et al.  Entrepreneurs' human and social capital: direct and reinforcing benefits for export , 2014 .

[15]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Relation contents in multiple networks , 1985 .

[16]  S. Sedita,et al.  Learning at the boundaries in an "Open Regional Innovation System": A focus on firms' innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry , 2010 .

[17]  Pia Arenius,et al.  Nations of Entrepreneurs: A Social Capital Perspective , 2010 .

[18]  Laura Galloway,et al.  Global Entrepreneurship Monitor , 2002 .

[19]  David Urbano,et al.  Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: an international study , 2014 .

[20]  S. Shane.  A General Theory of Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[21]  J. Aram,et al.  Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China☆ , 1995 .

[22]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[23]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[24]  Tansel Özyer,et al.  State of the Art Applications of Social Network Analysis , 2014, Lecture Notes in Social Networks.

[25]  S. Shane.  A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus , 2003 .

[26]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Social networks in the R&D process: the case of the wireless communication industry around Aalborg, Denmark , 2005 .

[28]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Collaboration in Product Innovation in the East Gothia Regional System of Innovation , 2000 .

[29]  M. Weber,et al.  The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism , 1937 .

[30]  Jon Rokne,et al.  Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining , 2014, Springer New York.

[31]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[32]  Erkko Autio,et al.  A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model , 2008 .

[33]  Thomas Schott,et al.  Entrepreneurs' Networks: Size, Diversity and Composition Shaped by Cultures of Rationality and Trust , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[34]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some societies invent more than others , 1992 .

[35]  Frank Moulaert,et al.  The Social Region , 2005 .

[36]  Tim Kastelle,et al.  The Role of Networks in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprise Innovation and Firm Performance , 2012 .

[37]  Saras D. Sarasvathy,et al.  Effectuation , 2008 .

[38]  B. Carlsson,et al.  The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research , 2013, Small Business Economics.

[39]  Amalya L. Oliver.  Networks for Learning and Knowledge Creation in Biotechnology: List of figures , 2009 .

[40]  Amalya Lumerman Oliver.  Networks for learning and knowledge creation in biotechnology , 2009 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  P. Davidsson,et al.  The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs , 2000 .

[43]  Wipo,et al.  Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth , 2012 .