Unplanned Reoperation within 30 Days of Fusion Surgery for Spinal Deformity

No recent studies have analyzed the rates of or reasons for unanticipated revision surgery within 30 days of primary surgery in spinal deformity patients. Our aim was to examine the incidence, characteristics, reasons, and risk factors for unplanned revision surgery in spinal deformity patients treated at one institution. All patients with a diagnosis of spinal deformity presenting for primary instrumented spinal fusion at a single institution from 1998 to 2012 were reviewed. All unplanned reoperations performed within 30 days after primary surgery were analyzed in terms of demographics, surgical data, and complications. Statistical analyses were performed to obtain correlations and risk factors for anticipated revision. Of 2758 patients [aged 16.07 years (range, 2–71), 69.8% female] who underwent spinal fusion surgery, 59 (2.1%) required reoperation within 30 days after primary surgery. The length of follow up for each patient was more than 30 days. Of those that required reoperation, 87.0% had posterior surgery only, 5.7% had anterior surgery, and 7.3% underwent an anteroposterior approach. The reasons for reoperation included implant failure (n = 20), wound infection (n = 12), neurologic deficit (n = 9), pulmonary complications (n = 17), and coronal plane imbalance (n = 1). The risk factors for reoperation were age, diagnosis, and surgical procedure with osteotomy.

[1]  H. Brachinger,et al.  Decision analysis , 1997 .

[2]  G. Nell Issues and Complications , 2013 .

[3]  S. McSorley,et al.  Unplanned reoperation within 30 days of surgery for colorectal cancer in NHS Lanarkshire , 2013, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[4]  A. Shroyer,et al.  Risk analysis for readmission after coronary artery bypass surgery: developing a strategy to reduce readmissions. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  Z. Csernátony,et al.  Our experience and early results with a complementary implant for the correction of major thoracic curves , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[6]  A. Crawford,et al.  Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis After Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Spine.

[7]  B. S. Richards,et al.  Repeat Surgical Interventions Following “Definitive” Instrumentation and Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis: Five-Year Update on a Previously Published Cohort , 2012, Spine.

[8]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Unplanned reoperation rates in pediatric neurosurgery: a single center experience and proposed use as a quality indicator. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[9]  M. Campos,et al.  Unanticipated Revision Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2012, Spine.

[10]  P. Guigui,et al.  Complications and Risk Factors of Primary Adult Scoliosis Surgery: A Multicenter Study of 306 Patients , 2012, Spine.

[11]  C. Liang,et al.  Surgery is an Effective and Reasonable Treatment for Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review , 2012, The Journal of international medical research.

[12]  A. Darzi,et al.  Single measures of performance do not reflect overall institutional quality in colorectal cancer surgery , 2012, Gut.

[13]  R. Lehman Postoperative lymphocele after revision circumferential long-segment scoliosis construct for pseudarthrosis. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  P. Rama-Maceiras,et al.  Unplanned surgical reoperations in a tertiary hospital: perioperative mortality and associated risk factors , 2011, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[15]  P. Sponseller Pediatric Revision Spinal Deformity Surgery: Issues and Complications , 2010, Spine.

[16]  M. Abel,et al.  Infection Rate after Spine Surgery in Cerebral Palsy is High and Impairs Results: Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors and Treatment , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  Christopher R. Good,et al.  Revision Rates Following Primary Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Six Hundred Forty-Three Consecutive Patients Followed-up to Twenty-Two Years Postoperative , 2010, Spine.

[18]  Matthew A. Davis,et al.  Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Anterior/Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Decision Analysis , 2009, Spine.

[19]  V. Deviren,et al.  Reoperation After Primary Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: Rate, Reason, and Timing , 2009, Spine.

[20]  V. Deviren,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Deep Wound Infection After Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Matched Cohort Analysis , 2009, Spine.

[21]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[22]  L. Lenke,et al.  Non-neurologic complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  B. S. Richards,et al.  Repeat Surgical Interventions Following “Definitive” Instrumentation and Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2006, Spine.

[24]  R. Függer,et al.  Unplanned reoperations for infection complications: a survey for quality control. , 2006, Surgical infections.

[25]  J. Buchowski,et al.  Spinal Fusion After Revision Surgery for Pseudarthrosis in Adult Scoliosis , 2006, Spine.

[26]  D. Schlenzka,et al.  Implant removal for late-developing infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis: reinstrumentation reduces loss of correction. A retrospective analysis of 45 cases , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[27]  C. Shaffrey,et al.  Management of complex pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[28]  R. Winter,et al.  Wound infections in reconstructive spine surgery. , 1996, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.