Optimization of interactive visual-similarity-based search

At one end of the spectrum, research in interactive content-based retrieval concentrates on machine learning methods for effective use of relevance feedback. On the other end, the information visualization community focuses on effective methods for conveying information to the user. What is lacking is research considering the information visualization and interactive retrieval as truly integrated parts of one content-based search system. In such an integrated system, there are many degrees of freedom like the similarity function, the number of images to display, the image size, different visualization modes, and possible feedback modes. To base the optimal values for all of those on user studies is unfeasible. We therefore develop search scenarios in which tasks and user actions are simulated. From there, the proposed scheme is optimized based on objective constraints and evaluation criteria. In such a manner, the degrees of freedom are reduced and the remaining degrees can be evaluated in user studies. In this article, we present a system that integrates advanced similarity based visualization with active learning. We have performed extensive experimentation on interactive category search with different image collections. The results using the proposed simulation scheme show that indeed the use of advanced visualization and active learning pays off in all of these datasets.

[1]  M. Basseville Distance measures for signal processing and pattern recognition , 1989 .

[2]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  One-class SVM for learning in image retrieval , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[4]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces , 2001, CSUR.

[5]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  The Amsterdam Library of Object Images , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  RICHARD C. DUBES,et al.  How many clusters are best? - An experiment , 1987, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? , 2001, CHI.

[8]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  c ○ 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Manufactured in The Netherlands. A Six-Stimulus Theory for Stochastic Texture , 2002 .

[9]  John R. Smith,et al.  Modeling semantic concepts to support query by keywords in video , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[10]  Qi Tian,et al.  Visualization and User-Modeling for Browsing Personal Photo Libraries , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  WorringMarcel,et al.  Optimization of interactive visual-similarity-based search , 2008 .

[12]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Perceptual metrics for image database navigation , 1999 .

[13]  G. P. Nguyen,et al.  Similarity based vizualization of image collections , 2005 .

[14]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Empirical evaluation of dissimilarity measures for color and texture , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[15]  G. P. Nguyen,et al.  Similarity Based Visualization of Image Collections , 2005 .

[16]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  Everything Gets Better All the Time, Apart from the Amount of Data , 2004, CIVR.

[17]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  PhotoMesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps , 2001, UIST '01.

[18]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval , 1998, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[19]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Learning similarity measure for natural image retrieval with relevance feedback , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[21]  Marcel Worring,et al.  MediaMill: exploring news video archives based on learned semantics , 2005, MULTIMEDIA '05.

[22]  David Zipser,et al.  Feature Discovery by Competive Learning , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Dissimilarity Measures for Color and Texture , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[24]  Michael J. Swain,et al.  Color indexing , 1991, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Relevance feedback in image retrieval: A comprehensive review , 2003, Multimedia Systems.

[26]  Edward Y. Chang,et al.  Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval , 2001, MULTIMEDIA '01.

[27]  Malik Yousef,et al.  One-Class SVMs for Document Classification , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[28]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Support vector machine learning for image retrieval , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[29]  Simone Santini,et al.  Emergent Semantics through Interaction in Image Databases , 2001, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[30]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Information Visualization and Visual Data Mining , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[31]  Matthieu Cord,et al.  RETIN AL: an active learning strategy for image category retrieval , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[32]  Stefan M. Rüger,et al.  Three Interfaces for Content-Based Access to Image Collections , 2004, CIVR.

[33]  Howard D. Wactlar,et al.  Putting active learning into multimedia applications: dynamic definition and refinement of concept classifiers , 2005, MULTIMEDIA '05.