State-based modeling of continuous human-integrated systems: An application to air traffic separation assurance

A method for modeling the safety of human-integrated systems that have continuous dynamics is introduced. The method is intended to supplement more detailed reliability-based methods. Assumptions for the model are defined such that the model is demonstrably complete, enabling it to yield a set of key agent characteristics. These key characteristics identify a sufficient set of characteristics that can be used to establish the safety of particular system configurations. The method is applied for the analysis of the safety of strategic and tactical separation assurance algorithms for the next generation air transportation system. It is shown that the key characteristics for this problem include the ability of agents (human or automated) to identify configurations that can enable intense transitions from a safe to unsafe state. However, the most technologically advanced algorithm for separation assurance does not currently attempt to identify such configurations. It is also discussed how, although the model is in a form that lends itself to quantitative evaluations, such evaluations are complicated by the difficulty of accurately quantifying human error probabilities.

[1]  H. Witsenhausen A class of hybrid-state continuous-time dynamic systems , 1966 .

[2]  Vitali Volovoi,et al.  Modeling of system reliability Petri nets with aging tokens , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Concept for Next Generation Air Traffic Control System , 2002 .

[4]  Jean-François Aubry,et al.  An aggregation method of Markov graphs for the reliability analysis of hybrid systems , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Flight to the Future: Human Factors in Air Traffic Control Edited by Christopher D. Wickens, Anne S. Mavor, & James P. McGee 1997, 368 pages, $44.95. Washington, DC: National Academy Press ISBN 0-309-05637-3 , 1997 .

[6]  Mark Hansen,et al.  Automation Adoption and Adaptation , 2005 .

[7]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[8]  Michael S. Nolan,et al.  Fundamentals of Air Traffic Control , 1990 .

[9]  Bernhard Reer Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission - Part 2: EOC quantification , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Human error data collection as a precursor to the development of a human reliability assessment capability in air traffic management , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Toshio Wakabayashi,et al.  Component-based modeling of systems for automated fault tree generation , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Model-Based Diagnosis of Hybrid Systems , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[13]  Arnold Barnett,et al.  Airline Safety: The Last Decade , 1989 .

[14]  A B Rauzy,et al.  Guarded transition systems: A new states/events formalism for reliability studies , 2008 .

[15]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Tactical Conflict Alerting Aid for Air Traffic Controllers , 2009 .

[16]  David Harel,et al.  Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems , 1987, Sci. Comput. Program..

[17]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Automating Scenario Analysis of Human and System Reliability , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[18]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Applied Reliability and Quality , 2007 .

[19]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  The Need for New Paradigms in Safety Engineering , 2009, SSS.

[21]  Simone Colombo,et al.  The systematic integration of human factors into safety analyses: An integrated engineering approach , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  David McNally,et al.  Concept and Laboratory Analysis of Trajectory-Based Automation for Separation Assurance , 2007 .

[23]  P. O'Connor,et al.  Practical Reliability Engineering , 1981 .

[24]  Timothy L. Johnson Improving automation software dependability: A role for formal methods? , 2004 .

[25]  Eric Bauer,et al.  Practical System Reliability , 2009 .