Some Quantum Measurements with Three Outcomes Can Reveal Nonclassicality where All Two-Outcome Measurements Fail to Do So.

Measurements serve as the intermediate communication layer between the quantum world and our classical perception. So, the question of which measurements efficiently extract information from quantum systems is of central interest. Using quantum steering as a nonclassical phenomenon, we show that there are instances where the results of all two-outcome measurements can be explained in a classical manner, while the results of some three-outcome measurements cannot. This points to the important role of the number of outcomes in revealing the nonclassicality hidden in a quantum system. Moreover, our methods allow us to improve the understanding of quantum correlations by delivering novel criteria for quantum steering and improved ways to construct local hidden variable models.

[1]  V. Scarani,et al.  One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steering , 2011, 1109.1435.

[2]  Remigiusz Augusiak,et al.  Local hidden–variable models for entangled quantum states , 2014, 1405.7321.

[3]  G. Tóth,et al.  Noise robustness of the nonlocality of entangled quantum states. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[4]  T. Moroder,et al.  Steering bound entangled States: a counterexample to the stronger Peres conjecture. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[5]  Nicolaas P. Landsman Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition , 2009 .

[6]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[7]  Rodrigo Gallego,et al.  The Resource Theory of Steering , 2014, TQC.

[8]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[9]  Michael J. W. Hall,et al.  Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering and the steering ellipsoid , 2014, 1411.1517.

[10]  Stephen Brierley,et al.  Convex separation from convex optimization for large-scale problems , 2016, 1609.05011.

[11]  Thanh Vu,et al.  Necessary and sufficient condition for steerability of two-qubit states by the geometry of steering outcomes , 2016 .

[12]  Thanh Vu,et al.  Quantum steering with positive operator valued measures , 2017, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[13]  A C Doherty,et al.  Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[14]  M. Kleinmann,et al.  Proposed experiment to test fundamentally binary theories , 2016, 1611.05761.

[15]  Tamás Vértesi,et al.  Joint measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, and Bell nonlocality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[16]  J. Barrett Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality , 2001, quant-ph/0107045.

[17]  Thanh Vu,et al.  Nonseparability and steerability of two-qubit states from the geometry of steering outcomes , 2016, 1604.00265.

[18]  H. Wiseman,et al.  Necessary conditions for steerability of two qubits from consideration of local operations , 2019, Physical Review A.

[19]  Otfried Gühne,et al.  Joint measurability of generalized measurements implies classicality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[20]  Werner,et al.  Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[21]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[22]  D Cavalcanti,et al.  Quantum steering: a review with focus on semidefinite programming , 2016, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[23]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Reduction criterion of separability and limits for a class of distillation protocols , 1999 .

[24]  E. Schrödinger Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , 1935, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[25]  O. Gühne,et al.  Geometry of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[26]  N. Brunner,et al.  Disproving the Peres conjecture by showing Bell nonlocality from bound entanglement , 2014, Nature Communications.

[27]  Otfried Gühne,et al.  One-to-One Mapping between Steering and Joint Measurability Problems. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[28]  Daniel Cavalcanti,et al.  Inequivalence of entanglement, steering, and Bell nonlocality for general measurements , 2015, 1501.03332.

[29]  Otfried Gühne,et al.  Quantum steering , 2019, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[30]  R. Mcweeny On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2000 .

[31]  M. Kleinmann,et al.  Observation of Stronger-than-Binary Correlations with Entangled Photonic Qutrits. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[32]  Adán Cabello,et al.  Quantum Correlations Are Stronger Than All Nonsignaling Correlations Produced by n-Outcome Measurements. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[33]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Classical randomness in quantum measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0408115.

[34]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .