Identifying Social Influence in Networks Using Randomized Experiments

The recent availability of massive amounts of networked data generated by email, instant messaging, mobile phone communications, micro blogs, and online social networks is enabling studies of population-level human interaction on scales orders of magnitude greater than what was previ ously possible.1'2 One important goal of applying statistical inference techniques to large networked datasets is to understand how behavioral conta gions spread in human social networks. More pre cisely, understanding how people influence or are influenced by their peers can help us understand the ebb and flow of market trends, product adoption and diffusion, the spread of health behaviors such as smoking and exercise, the productivity of information workers, and whether particular indi viduals in a social network have a disproportion ate amount of influence on the system.

[1]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[2]  Marshall Van Alstyne,et al.  The Diversity-Bandwidth Tradeoff , 2010 .

[3]  M. Mobius,et al.  Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks , 2009 .

[4]  Raghuram Iyengar,et al.  Tricked by Truncation: Spurious Duration Dependence and Social Contagion in Hazard Models , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[5]  Russell Lyons,et al.  The Spread of Evidence-Poor Medicine via Flawed Social-Network Analysis , 2010, 1007.2876.

[6]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  M. Kearns,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks , 2006, Science.

[8]  T. Snijders,et al.  Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior , 2007 .

[9]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies , 2010, Sociological methods & research.

[11]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[13]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Productivity Effects of Information Diffusion in Networks , 2007 .

[14]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. , 1996 .

[15]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[16]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Social Influence: A Comment on Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[17]  E. Duflo,et al.  The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment , 2002 .

[18]  Kees van Montfort,et al.  Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences , 2007 .

[19]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[21]  Keith F. Widaman Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences. K. van Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.) , 2011 .

[22]  Catherine Tucker,et al.  Identifying Formal and Informal Influence in Technology Adoption with Network Externalities , 2008, Manag. Sci..