Risk-based cost-benefit analysis of frame structures considering progressive collapse under column removal scenarios

Abstract The decision to design a frame structure to bridge over a column lost due to accidental loading has obvious impacts on construction costs. Moreover, not all structures are potential targets of hazards likely leading to column loss events. In this context, we propose a formulation for risk-based cost-benefit analysis of design for load bridging over failed columns. The formulation combines normal with abnormal loading conditions, treating column loss probability as an independent parameter. The proposed formulation is employed in design of continuous beams, typical RC floors and regular frame structures. The study reveals the conditions for load bridging design in frame structures to be cost-effective. We show that column loss probabilities play a major role in optimal design and reinforcement decisions. The proposed formulation allows optimal design of frame structures addressing competition between failure modes. Under discretionary column removal, competition between local bending and local pancake failures is typical of regular frame buildings, as stronger beams favor pancake compression failures.

[1]  Bruce R. Ellingwood Strategies for mitigating risk to buildings from abnormal load events , 2007 .

[2]  Simos Gerasimidis,et al.  Progressive collapse of 3D steel composite buildings under interior gravity column loss , 2018, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[3]  Yu Jun,et al.  A simplified approach to assess progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete framed structures , 2015 .

[4]  André T. Beck,et al.  Systematic Reliability-Based Approach to Progressive Collapse , 2018 .

[5]  Xian-Xun Yuan,et al.  Irregularity index for quick identification of worst column removal scenarios of RC frame structures , 2019 .

[6]  De-Cheng Feng,et al.  Robustness quantification of reinforced concrete structures subjected to progressive collapse via the probability density evolution method , 2020 .

[7]  Palle Thoft-Christensen,et al.  Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications , 1982 .

[8]  Kirk Marchand,et al.  Progressive Collapse Criteria and Design Approaches Improvement , 2015 .

[9]  André T. Beck,et al.  A comparison between robust and risk-based optimization under uncertainty , 2015 .

[10]  Donald O. Dusenberry,et al.  Building Design for Abnormal Loads and Progressive Collapse , 2005 .

[11]  André Teófilo Beck,et al.  Optimal design of redundant structural systems: fundamentals , 2020, Engineering Structures.

[12]  André T. Beck,et al.  A comparison of deterministic‚ reliability-based and risk-based structural optimization under uncertainty , 2012 .

[13]  Seymour M.J. Spence,et al.  A performance-based design framework for the integrated collapse and non-collapse assessment of wind excited buildings , 2017 .

[14]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  An efficient framework for the reliability-based design optimization of large-scale uncertain and stochastic linear systems , 2016 .

[15]  Theodore V. Galambos,et al.  Probability-based criteria for structural design , 1982 .

[16]  Seymour M.J. Spence,et al.  Performance-based multi-hazard topology optimization of wind and seismically excited structural systems , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[17]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Spatial reliability analysis of explosive blast load damage to reinforced concrete columns , 2015 .

[18]  Simos Gerasimidis Analytical assessment of steel frames progressive collapse vulnerability to corner column loss , 2014 .

[19]  Fulvio Parisi,et al.  Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[20]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Risk of progressive collapse of buildings from terrorist attacks: are the benefits of protection worth the cost? , 2017 .

[21]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Mitigating Risk from Abnormal Loads and Progressive Collapse , 2006 .

[22]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell Quantitative safety goals for risk management of industrial facilities , 1994 .

[23]  Ton Vrouwenvelder,et al.  The JCSS probabilistic model code , 1997 .

[24]  André Teófilo Beck,et al.  Reliability-based calibration of main Brazilian structural design codes , 2020 .

[25]  Bernardino Chiaia,et al.  Progressive collapse of 2D framed structures: An analytical model , 2013 .

[26]  P. Gardoni,et al.  Probabilistic models for blast parameters and fragility estimates of steel columns subject to blast loads , 2020 .

[27]  Sebastian Thöns,et al.  On decision optimality of terrorism risk mitigation measures for iconic bridges , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  André T. Beck,et al.  System reliability-based design optimization and risk-based optimization: a benchmark example considering progressive collapse , 2018, Engineering Optimization.

[29]  Progressive collapse resistance of steel-concrete composite floors , 2010 .

[30]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[31]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Approaches for Design against Progressive Collapse , 1978 .

[32]  Simos Gerasimidis,et al.  A new partial-distributed damage method for progressive collapse analysis of steel frames , 2016 .