Variation in cue duration reveals top-down modulation of involuntary orienting to uninformative symbolic cues

This article reports three experiments in which the effects of cue duration on involuntary orienting to uninformative symbolic cues (arrows presented at fixation) were investigated. Experiment 1 showed that symbolic cues had less effect on involuntary orienting when they were presented for only 25 msec than when they were presented for 200 msec across a range of stimulus onset asynchronies. Experiment 2 suggested that the effect of cue duration on involuntary orienting was due primarily to top-down strategic factors, rather than to bottom-up stimulus factors, and Experiment 3 suggested that these strategic factors may involve differences in how the cue is processed. Altogether, the present findings are important because they emphasize the distinction between cue processing and the putative involuntary orienting that results from such processing in the symbolic-cuing paradigm. In so doing, the present results help resolve discrepant findings that have been reported across previous studies.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  J. Hietanen.  Does your gaze direction and head orientation shift my visual attention? , 1999, Neuroreport.

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  J. Tipples.  Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  What Is Learned During Automatization? The Role of Attention in Constructing an Instance , 1994 .

[6]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[7]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Reflexive Joint Attention Depends on Lateralized Cortical Connections , 2000, Psychological science.

[10]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Cheal,et al.  Central and Peripheral Precuing of Forced-Choice Discrimination , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[15]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[16]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[17]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[18]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S. Yantis.  Control of visual attention. , 1998 .

[20]  B. Hommel.  Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[21]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981 .

[22]  S. Yantis.  2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .

[23]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Abrupt onsets and gaze direction cues trigger independent reflexive attentional effects , 2003, Cognition.

[24]  D. Besner,et al.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  William Epstein,et al.  Automatic and attentional components in perception of shape-at-a-slant , 1985 .

[26]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[28]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture Is Contingent on Attentional Set for Displaywide Visual Features , 1998 .

[29]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[32]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic Control of Visual Attention , 2001, Psychological science.