Effect of floor joint design on catenary actions of precast floor slab system

Abstract To prevent progressive collapse of building structures, the establishment of the catenary action mechanism of beams or slabs is crucial so that adequate post-collapse resistance can be attained. It is believed that the joint design of precast floor system, e.g. the tie design, plays a key role in facilitating such a mechanism. An experimental study has been undertaken to investigate the catenary behaviour of the precast concrete slab system following the removal of the intermediate wall supports. To this end, five large-scale concrete floor assembly tests have been devised and carried out. Each test consisted of two standard hollow core floor slab units with various tie arrangements at the joints, which resembled a single storey floor structure supported by cross walls. The floor joint ties were placed on the pre-existing keyways where the grout was cast after the test assemblies were set up. The grout strength was specified to be 20–30 MPa and 10 or 12 mm tie bars were used with an embedment length ranging from 250 mm to 350 mm. Test results indicated that specimens experiencing bar fracture failure patterns collapsed prior to the formation of the catenary action, but those specimens with the pull-out failure pattern showed clear evidence of catenary behaviour. Furthermore, the difference in the post-collapse behaviour and the failure patterns indicated the characteristics of the catenary action. Test results reveal that for the ties designed with inadequate embedment length, the slip and the resulting large deflection will effectively trigger the catenary action. However, the full bond will limit the development deflection and lead to the fracture of tie bars before the catenary action is trigged.

[1]  Gary F. Panariello,et al.  Study of Mitigation Strategies for Progressive Collapse of a Reinforced Concrete Commercial Building , 2006 .

[2]  Mosleh Tohidi Effect of floor-to-floor joint design on the robustness of precast concrete cross wall buildings , 2015 .

[3]  M. Loog,et al.  Automatic classification of municipal call data to support quantitative risk analysis of urban drainage systems , 2010 .

[4]  Andrew Scanlon,et al.  Behavior of Large Panel Precast Coupled Wall Systems Subjected to Earthquake Loading , 1988 .

[5]  Charalampos Baniotopoulos,et al.  A computational model for full or partial damage of single or multiple adjacent columns in disproportionate collapse analysis via linear programming , 2014 .

[6]  Youpo Su,et al.  Progressive Collapse Resistance of Axially-Restrained Frame Beams , 2009 .

[7]  Min Yu,et al.  The influence of joints and composite floor slabs on effective tying of steel structures in preventing progressive collapse , 2010 .

[8]  Jun Yu,et al.  Experimental study on catenary action of RC beam-column subassemblages , 2010 .

[9]  O. A. Pekau,et al.  Progressive collapse simulation of precast panel shear walls during earthquakes , 2006 .

[10]  L. Ye,et al.  An improved tie force method for progressive collapse resistance design of reinforced concrete frame structures , 2011 .

[11]  Mehrdad Sasani,et al.  Progressive collapse analysis of an RC structure , 2008 .

[12]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse-Resistant Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures , 2008 .

[13]  Donald O. Dusenberry,et al.  Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings | NIST , 2007 .

[14]  Jian Yang,et al.  Numerical evaluations of codified design methods for progressive collapse resistance of precast concrete cross wall structures , 2014 .

[15]  Sarah Orton,et al.  Development of a CFRP system to provide continuity in existing reinforced concrete buildings vulnerable to progressive collapse , 2007 .