Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Internet Communities

There has been a rapid growth in the number of articles using Internet data sources to illuminate health behavior. However, little has been written about the ethical considerations of online research, especially studies involving data from Internet discussion boards. Guidelines are needed to ensure ethical conduct. In this article, the authors examine how a youth-focused research program negotiated ethical practices in the creation of its comprehensive health site and online message board. They address three situations in which ethical predicaments arose: (a) enrolling research participants, (b) protecting participants from risk or harm, and (c) linking public and private data. Drawing on the ethical principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, justice, and beneficence, the authors present practical guidelines for resolving ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities.

[1]  H. Skinner,et al.  Youth social action: building a global latticework through information and communication technologies. , 2002, Health promotion international.

[2]  H. Skinner.  Promoting Health through Organizational Change , 2002 .

[3]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  E‐Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet , 2002 .

[4]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  J Sixsmith,et al.  Ethical Issues in the Documentary Data Analysis of Internet Posts and Archives , 2001, Qualitative health research.

[6]  J. Horrigan.  Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties , 2001 .

[7]  Robert C. Hsiung,et al.  The Best of Both Worlds: An Online Self-Help Group Hosted by a Mental Health Professional , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  J. Rodriguez,et al.  Legal, ethical, and professional issues to consider when communicating via the Internet: a suggested response model and policy. , 1999, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[9]  J. Finn,et al.  An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. , 1999, Health & social work.

[10]  B. F. Sharf.  Beyond Netiquette: The Ethics of Doing Naturalistic Discourse Research on the Internet , 1999 .

[11]  N. Weir,et al.  Using the Internet to Engage Youth in Health Promotion , 1997, Promotion & education.

[12]  B. F. Sharf.  Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. , 1997, Women & health.

[13]  A. Winzelberg.  The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders , 1997 .

[14]  G. Bogat,et al.  Mutual help goes on‐line , 1997 .

[15]  J. Finn.  Computer-Based Self-Help Groups: On-Line Recovery for Addictions , 1996 .

[16]  Elizabeth Reid.  Informed Consent in the Study of On-Line Communities: A Reflection on the Effects of Computer-Mediated Social Research , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[17]  Dennis Waskul,et al.  Considering the Electronic Participant: Some Polemical Observations on the Ethics of On-Line Research , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[18]  Christina Allen,et al.  What's Wrong with the 'Golden Rule'? Conundrums of Conducting Ethical Research in Cyberspace , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[19]  Storm A. King,et al.  Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[20]  J. Finn.  Computer-Based Self-Help Groups , 1995 .

[21]  J. Rosenoer,et al.  Observational research on the electronic superhighway , 1995 .

[22]  R. Macklin,et al.  Observational research on the electronic superhighway; Problems on the Internet: a lawyer's perspective; The networker's perspective; Bioethics perspective; User's perspective. , 1995, Ethics & behavior.

[23]  Robert Alun Jones,et al.  The Ethics of Research in Cyberspace , 1994 .

[24]  Jerry Finn,et al.  Computer-Based Self-Help Groups for Sexual Abuse Survivors , 1994 .