Cluster analysis of activity‐time series in motor learning

Neuroimaging studies of learning focus on brain areas where the activity changes as a function of time. To circumvent the difficult problem of model selection, we used a data‐driven analytic tool, cluster analysis, which extracts representative temporal and spatial patterns from the voxel‐time series. The optimal number of clusters was chosen using a cross‐validated likelihood method, which highlights the clustering pattern that generalizes best over the subjects. Data were acquired with PET at different time points during practice of a visuomotor task. The results from cluster analysis show practice‐related activity in a fronto‐parieto‐cerebellar network, in agreement with previous studies of motor learning. These voxels were separated from a group of voxels showing an unspecific time‐effect and another group of voxels, whose activation was an artifact from smoothing. Hum. Brain Mapping 15:135–145, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[2]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot‐aided functional imaging: Application to a motor learning study , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Clustering Using Monte Carlo Cross-Validation , 1996, KDD.

[4]  Gérard Govaert,et al.  Assessing a Mixture Model for Clustering with the Integrated Completed Likelihood , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Svarer,et al.  Rate Dependence of Regional Cerebral Activation during Performance of a Repetitive Motor Task: A PET Study , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[8]  Karl J. Friston Analysing brain images: principles and overview , 1997 .

[9]  J. Bezdek Cluster Validity with Fuzzy Sets , 1973 .

[10]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Convergence Properties of the K-Means Algorithms , 1994, NIPS.

[12]  J. C. Dunn,et al.  A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters , 1973 .

[13]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Feature‐space clustering for fMRI meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[14]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Task-Independent Effect of Time on rCBF , 1998, NeuroImage.

[16]  S. Petersen,et al.  Changes in brain activity during motor learning measured with PET: effects of hand of performance and practice. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  T K Lewellen,et al.  PET imaging using dual-headed gamma cameras: an update. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.

[18]  F. Å. Nielsen,et al.  lyngby 2.0 — A modeler's matlab tool☐ for spatio-temporal analysis of functional neuroimages , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[21]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[22]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Regression in Parametric Activation Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[24]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Unsupervised learning and generalization , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96).

[25]  Jesper L. R. Andersson,et al.  How to Estimate Global Activity Independent of Changes in Local Activity , 1997, NeuroImage.

[26]  D. Brooks,et al.  Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Multivariate Predictive Relationship between Kinematic and Functional Activation Patterns in a PET Study of Visuomotor Learning , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Nonlinear versus Linear Models in Functional Neuroimaging: Learning Curves and Generalization Crossover , 1997, IPMI.

[29]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Extraretinal modulation of cerebral blood flow in the human visual cortex: implications for saccadic suppression. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An MRI-Based Probabilistic Atlas of Neuroanatomy , 1994 .

[31]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  T G Turkington,et al.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  R. Passingham,et al.  The Time Course of Changes during Motor Sequence Learning: A Whole-Brain fMRI Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[34]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional imaging of procedural motor learning: Relating cerebral blood flow with individual subject performance , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Michael Erb,et al.  Dynamical Cluster Analysis of Cortical fMRI Activation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[37]  Daniel R. Weinberger,et al.  Changing patterns of brain activation during maze learning , 1998, Brain Research.

[38]  Stuart A. Roberts,et al.  New methods for the initialisation of clusters , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[39]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  A cluster analysis approach for the characterization of dynamic PET data , 1996 .

[40]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis , 1998, Comput. J..

[42]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Prefrontal-basal ganglia pathways are involved in the learning of arbitrary visuomotor associations: a PET study , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  S. Kinomura,et al.  A PET Study of Visuomotor Learning under Optical Rotation , 2000, NeuroImage.

[44]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[45]  R Baumgartner,et al.  Fuzzy clustering of gradient‐echo functional MRI in the human visual cortex. Part I: Reproducibility , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[47]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Model selection for probabilistic clustering using cross-validated likelihood , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[48]  M. Jüptner,et al.  A review of differences between basal ganglia and cerebellar control of movements as revealed by functional imaging studies. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  M. Hallett,et al.  Frontal and parietal networks for conditional motor learning: a positron emission tomography study. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  M Ingvar,et al.  Learning‐related effects and functional neuroimaging , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[51]  G. Celeux,et al.  A Classification EM algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versions , 1992 .

[52]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.