Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography.

This paper reviews data acquisition and signal processing issues relative to producing an amplitude estimate of surface EMG. The paper covers two principle areas. First, methods for reducing noise, artefact and interference in recorded EMG are described. Wherever possible noise should be reduced at the source via appropriate skin preparation, and the use of well designed active electrodes and signal recording instrumentation. Despite these efforts, some noise will always accompany the desired signal, thus signal processing techniques for noise reduction (e.g. band-pass filtering, adaptive noise cancellation filters and filters based on the wavelet transform) are discussed. Second, methods for estimating the amplitude of the EMG are reviewed. Most advanced, high-fidelity methods consist of six sequential stages: noise rejection/filtering, whitening, multiple-channel combination, amplitude demodulation, smoothing and relinearization. Theoretical and experimental research related to each of the above topics is reviewed and the current recommended practices are described.

[1]  Fuqin Q. Xiong,et al.  Some Aspects of Nonstationary Myoelectric Signal Processing , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  M I Harba,et al.  Optimizing the acquisition and processing of surface electromyographic signals. , 1981, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[3]  R. Stein,et al.  The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  P. Herberts The Control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses , 1974 .

[5]  S. Meek,et al.  Comparison of signal-to-noise ratio of myoelectric filters for prosthesis control. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  P.S. Hamilton,et al.  Adaptive Removal of Motion Artifact , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[7]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[8]  Stephen C. Jacobsen,et al.  ADAPTIVE MYOELECTRIC FILTER. , 1984 .

[9]  R. Pallas-Areny,et al.  Interference-rejection characteristics of biopotential amplifiers: a comparative analysis , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  John G. Webster,et al.  Reductionl of Interference Due to Common Mode Voltage in Biopotential Amplifiers , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Wade G. Holcomb,et al.  Principles of Applied Biomedical Instrumentation , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[12]  J. Kreifeldt Signal versus noise characteristics of filtered EMG used as a control source. , 1971, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[13]  John G. Webster,et al.  Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design , 1997 .

[14]  E.A. Clancy,et al.  Electromyogram amplitude estimation with adaptive smoothing window length , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  M. Ferdjallah,et al.  Adaptive digital notch filter design on the unit circle for the removal of powerline noise from biomedical signals , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[17]  H. Koymen,et al.  A new technique for line interference monitoring and reduction in biopotential amplifiers , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  P.A. Parker,et al.  Signal processing for the multistate myoelectric channel , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  J. Saunders,et al.  Relation of human electromyogram to muscular tension. , 1952, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  Neville Hogan,et al.  EMG Amplitude Estimation From Temporally Whitened, Spatially Uncorrelated Multiple Channel EMG , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  J. Webster,et al.  Minimizing Electrode Motion Artifact by Skin Abrasion , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  N. Hogan,et al.  Multiple site electromyograph amplitude estimation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  N. Hogan,et al.  Probability density of the surface electromyogram and its relation to amplitude detectors , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Klijn Ja,et al.  Cable artefact suppressor for electrophysiological recording. , 1973 .

[25]  J. Webster Reducing Motion Artifacts and Interference in Biopotential Recording , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  E. Kaplan Muscles Alive. Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. J. V. Basmajian. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Co., 1962. $8.50 , 1962 .

[27]  T. D'Alessio,et al.  Analysis of a Digital EMG Signal Processor in Dynamic Conditions , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Philip A. Parker,et al.  Signal Processing for Proportional Myoelectric Control , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  N. Hogan,et al.  Relating agonist-antagonist electromyograms to joint torque during isometric, quasi-isotonic, nonfatiguing contractions , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  J G Kreifeldt,et al.  A signal-to-noise investigation of nonlinear electromyographic processors. , 1974, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[31]  C.A. Grimbergen,et al.  The isolation mode rejection ratio in bioelectric amplifiers , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Edward A. Clancy,et al.  Emg Amplitude Estimation: A Review Of The Past And A Look Towards The Future , 1997 .

[33]  Robert W. Mann,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part I: Derivation of the Optimal Myoprocessor , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  L A Geddes,et al.  Active cables for use with dry electrodes for electrocardiography. , 1978, Journal of electrocardiology.

[35]  J A Klijn,et al.  Cable artefact suppressor for electrophysiological recording. , 1973, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  D. Farina,et al.  Geometrical factors in surface EMG of the vastus medialis and lateralis muscles. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[37]  D Chaffin,et al.  High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[38]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications , 1975 .

[39]  L. Geddes,et al.  Electrode Potential Stability , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  R. Rees Fullmer,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF AN ADAPTIVE MYOELECTRIC FILTER. , 1984 .

[41]  N. Hogan,et al.  Single site electromyograph amplitude estimation , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Tadashi Masuda,et al.  A Note on the Time Constant in Low-Pass Filtering of Rectified Surface EMG , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  M. Knaflitz,et al.  A statistical method for the measurement of muscle activation intervals from surface myoelectric signal during gait , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part II: Experimental Demonstration of Optimal Myoprocessor Performance , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  H. Hermens,et al.  SENIAM 8: European recommendations for surface electromyography , 1999 .

[46]  W R Murray,et al.  An optimal real-time digital processor for the electric activity of muscle. , 1985, Medical instrumentation.

[47]  R. D. Ray,et al.  Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II , 1985 .

[48]  E. Clancy,et al.  Influence of smoothing window length on electromyogram amplitude estimates , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  A. Edward Stochastic modeling of the relationship between the surface electromyogram and muscle torque , 1991 .

[50]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing (2nd edn)1 Numerical Recipes Example Book (C++) (2nd edn)2 Numerical Recipes Multi-Language Code CD ROM with LINUX or UNIX Single-Screen License Revised Version3 , 2003 .

[51]  T D'Alessio Some results on the optimization of a digital processor for surface EMG signals. , 1984, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  Morris Milner,et al.  An Optimality Criterion for Processing Electromyographic (EMG) Signals Relating to Human Locomotion , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[53]  S Conforto,et al.  Optimal rejection of movement artefacts from myoelectric signals by means of a wavelet filtering procedure. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[54]  G E Caldwell,et al.  Physiology and interpretation of the electromyogram. , 1996, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[55]  S. Nishimura,et al.  Clinical application of an active electrode using an operational amplifier , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[56]  P. Akkiraju,et al.  Adaptive cancellation technique in processing myoelectric activity of respiratory muscles , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[57]  Neri Accornero,et al.  TOWARD A REAL TIME ADAPTIVE PROCESSOR FOR SURFACE EMG SIGNALS. , 1987 .

[58]  Gian Carlo Filligoi,et al.  Some Theoretic Results on a Digital EMG Signal Processor , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[59]  H. Devries MUSCLES ALIVE-THEIR FUNCTIONS REVEALED BY ELECTROMYOGRAPHY , 1976 .

[60]  Euljoon Park,et al.  Adaptive filtering of the electromyographic signal for prosthetic control and force estimation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[61]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Methods to reduce the variability of EMG power spectrum estimates. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[62]  S. Thusneyapan,et al.  A practical electrode-array myoprocessor for surface electromyography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[63]  Richard T. Johnson,et al.  Development of the Utah Artificial Arm , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[64]  D. Gravel,et al.  Normality and stationarity of EMG signals of elbow flexor muscles during ramp and step isometric contractions. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[65]  Edward A. Clancy,et al.  Adaptive whitening of the electromyogram to improve amplitude estimation , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[66]  Elizabeth Greenwell Yanik,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing 2nd Ed. (W. H. Press, W. T. Vetterling, S. A. Teukolsky and B. P. Flannery) , 1994, SIAM Rev..

[67]  R. Triolo,et al.  The identification of time series models of lower extremity EMG for the control of prostheses using Box-Jenkins criteria , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.