Virtual Reality–Induced Cortical Reorganization and Associated Locomotor Recovery in Chronic Stroke: An Experimenter-Blind Randomized Study

Background and Purpose— Virtual reality (VR) is a new promising computer-assisted technology to promote motor recovery in stroke patients. VR-induced neuroplasticity supporting locomotor recovery is not known. We investigated the effects of VR intervention on cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in stroke patients. Methods— Ten chronic stroke patients were assigned randomly to either the control group or the VR group. VR was designed to provide interactive real-life practice environments in which practice parameters can be individualized to optimize motor relearning. Laterality index (LI) in the regions of interests (ROIs) and locomotor recovery were measured before and after VR using functional MRI (fMRI) and standardized locomotor tests, respectively. The t test and nonparametric test were performed to compare the mean differences at P<0.05. Results— There was a significant difference in the interval change in the LI score for the primary sensorimotor cortex (SMC) between the groups (P<0.05), indicating that VR practice produced a greater increase in LI for the control group. However, the interval changes in the other ROIs were not significantly different (P>0.05). Motor function was significantly improved after VR (P<0.05). Conclusions— Our novel findings suggest that VR could induce cortical reorganization from aberrant ipsilateral to contralateral SMC activation. This enhanced cortical reorganization might play an important role in recovery of locomotor function in patients with chronic stroke. This is the first fMRI study in the literature that provides evidence for neuroplasticity and associated locomotor recovery after VR.

[1]  B. Anderson,et al.  Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[2]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Potential pitfalls of functional MRI using conventional gradient‐recalled echo techniques , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  T. Jones,et al.  Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Passingham,et al.  Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  H. Lüders.  Supplementary sensorimotor area , 1996 .

[8]  H Shibasaki,et al.  The functions of the supplementary motor area. Summary of a workshop. , 1996, Advances in neurology.

[9]  H. Ellis.  stroke , 1997, The Lancet.

[10]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  An fMRI study of the human cortical motor system response to increasing functional demands. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  H. Fukuyama,et al.  Brain functional activity during gait in normal subjects: a SPECT study , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  B. Rosen,et al.  A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[13]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Effects of movement predictability on cortical motor activation , 1998, Neuroscience Research.

[14]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[16]  J. Darrah,et al.  Effects of neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) for cerebral palsy: an AACPDM evidence report. , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  K. Kubota,et al.  Cortical Mapping of Gait in Humans: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Topography Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Adamovich,et al.  Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[19]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  E. Protas,et al.  Performance-based gait tests for acute stroke patients. , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  Maureen,et al.  AACPDM Evidence Report: Effects of Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT) for Cerebral Palsy , 2002 .

[22]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Ichiro Miyai,et al.  Premotor cortex is involved in restoration of gait in stroke , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[24]  Peter Levine,et al.  Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[25]  Denise Reid,et al.  The use of virtual reality to improve upper-extremity efficiency skills in children with cerebral palsy: A pilot study , 2002 .

[26]  E. Taub,et al.  Pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy for a young child with cerebral palsy: two episodes of care. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[27]  K. Kubota,et al.  Longitudinal Optical Imaging Study for Locomotor Recovery After Stroke , 2003, Stroke.

[28]  Sung Ho Jang,et al.  Ipsilateral motor pathway confirmed by diffusion tensor tractography in a patient with schizencephaly , 2004, Neuroreport.