Dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension.

Syntactic and semantic processing of literal and idiomatic phrases were investigated with a priming procedure. In 3 experiments, participants named targets that were syntactically appropriate or inappropriate completions for semantically unrelated sentence contexts. Sentences ended with incomplete idioms (kick the...) and were biased for either a literal (ball) or an idiomatic (bucket) completion. Syntactically appropriate targets were named more quickly than inappropriate ones for both contextual biases, suggesting that syntactic analysis occurs for idioms. In a final experiment, targets were either concrete (expected) or abstract (unexpected) nouns. For literal sentences, the abstract targets were named more slowly than the concrete targets. In contrast, there was no concreteness effect for idiomatic sentences, suggesting that the literal meaning of the idiom is not processed. Overall, the results provide evidence for dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing.

[1]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  M. Garrett,et al.  Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[3]  W. F. Battig,et al.  Handbook of semantic word norms , 1978 .

[4]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing , 1989 .

[6]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[7]  C. Clifton,et al.  Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension , 1983, Cognition.

[8]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms: Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Technical Report No. 93. , 1978 .

[9]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[11]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  G. Nunberg.  The pragmatics of reference , 1978 .

[13]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The access and processing of idiomatic expressions , 1979 .

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Constituent Attachment and Thematic Role Assignment in Sentence Processing: Influences of Content-Based Expectations , 1988 .

[16]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[17]  Kim Ainsworth-Darnell,et al.  Dissociating Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998 .

[18]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[19]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Descriptive Norms for 171 Idiomatic Expressions: Familiarity, Compositionality, Predictability, and Literality , 1994 .

[20]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[21]  P. O'Seaghdha.  The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions , 1999 .

[23]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation∗ , 1986 .

[24]  Julie E. Boland.  The role of verb argument structure in sentence processing: Distinguishing between syntactic and semantic effects , 1993, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[25]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms , 1985, Cognition.

[26]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[28]  K Bock,et al.  That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blendsß , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[30]  A. Friederici,et al.  Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[31]  B. McElree,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence for a Temporal Dissociation , 1995 .

[32]  P. Tabossi,et al.  The comprehension of idioms. , 1988 .

[33]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[34]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[35]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[36]  Robert Timothy Reagan.  The syntax of English idioms: Can the dog be put on? , 1987 .

[37]  M T Turvey,et al.  Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[38]  C M Connine,et al.  Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: effects of predictability and literality. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992 .

[40]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. , 1989 .

[41]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[42]  Julie E. Boland.  The Relationship Between Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Sentence Comprehension. , 1997 .

[43]  Jennifer L. Hamblin,et al.  Why You Can't Kick the Bucket as You Slowly Die: Verbs in Idiom Comprehension , 1999 .

[44]  Adam Makkai,et al.  A Dictionary of American Idioms , 1995 .

[45]  Padraig G. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.