Measurement of suspended sand concentrations in the nearshore: field intercomparison of optical and acoustic backscatter sensors

Abstract Collocated field measurements of near-bed suspended sand concentrations were obtained using optical and acoustic sensors in order to assess the ability of such instruments to replicate sand concentration fluctuations over a range of time scales. Concentrations averaged over several minutes agree within ± 10%, indicating the instruments are probably both giving reasonable estimates of concentration. Deviations between the estimates of concentration increase as averaging time decreases. Deviations reflect both instrumental uncertainties and real spatial variability in concentration, over distance scales of less than 15 cm, related to vortex ejection from bedforms. Sediment transport rates computed from direct measurements are also sensitive to location and sampling, possibly due to instrument position relative to bedforms.

[1]  D. G. Hazen,et al.  UDATS: A system for measuring nearshore processes , 1987, OCEANS '87.

[2]  K. Bedford,et al.  Acoustic Backscatter System (ABSS): The instrument and some preliminary results , 1985 .

[3]  D. Hanes Suspension of sand due to wave groups , 1991 .

[4]  R. Sternberg,et al.  CHAPTER ONE HUNDRED TWENTY Field Investigations of Suspended Sediment Transport in the Nearshore Zone , 2010 .

[5]  R. Guza,et al.  Field intercomparisons of electromagnetic current meters , 1988 .

[6]  David A. Huntley,et al.  Continuous measurements of suspended sand concentration in a wave dominated nearshore environment , 1986 .

[7]  Philip D. Osborne,et al.  Frequency dependent cross-shore suspended sediment transport. 1. A non-barred shoreface , 1992 .

[8]  D. Huntley,et al.  Acoustic measurements of suspended sand concentration in the C2S2 experiment at Stanhope Lane, Prince Edward Island , 1988 .

[9]  A. Bowen,et al.  Acoustic measurements of suspended sand on the shoreface and the control of concentration by bed roughness , 1991 .

[10]  J. Downing,et al.  An Optical Instrument For Monitoring Suspended Particulates In Ocean And Laboratory , 1983, Proceedings OCEANS '83.

[11]  R. Young,et al.  Acoustic profiling of suspended sediments in the marine bottom boundary layer , 1982 .

[12]  R. Guza Comment on “Kinematic and dynamic estimates from electromagnetic current meter data” by David G. Aubrey and John H. Trowbridge , 1988 .

[13]  J. Sheng,et al.  An Examination of the Spherical Scatterer Approximation in Aqueous Suspensions of Sand , 1988 .

[14]  J. Trowbridge,et al.  Reply [to “Comment on ‘Kinematic and dynamic estimates from electromagnetic current meter data’ by D. G. Aubrey and J. H. Trowbridge”] , 1988 .

[15]  J. C. Doering,et al.  Skewness in the nearshore zone: A comparison of estimates from Marsh‐McBirney current meters and colocated pressure sensors , 1987 .

[16]  J. Doering,et al.  WAVE-INDUCED FLOW AND NEARSHORE SUSPENDED SEDIMENT , 1988 .

[17]  R. Sternberg,et al.  THE ROLE OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT IN SHORE-NORMAL BEACH PROFILE CHANGES , 1984 .

[18]  John H. Trowbridge,et al.  Dynamic response of electromagnetic current meters , 1984 .

[19]  John P. Downing,et al.  New instrumentation for the investigation of sediment suspension processes in the shallow marine environment , 1981 .

[20]  D. Huntley,et al.  Direct Measurement of Suspended Sediment Transport , 1987 .

[21]  C. Vincent,et al.  Field measurements of the suspended sand concentration profiles and fluxes and of the resuspension coefficient γ0 over a rippled bed , 1990 .

[22]  A. Bowen,et al.  Nearshore Sediment Flux and Bottom Boundary Dynamics the Canadian Coastal Sediment Transport Programme (C-Coast) , 1991 .

[23]  J. Trowbridge,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic estimates from electromagnetic current meter data , 1985 .

[24]  J. Lynch,et al.  The interpretation and evaluation of a 3‐MHz acoustic backscatter device for measuring benthic boundary layer sediment dynamics , 1989 .